I didn’t conjure up the facts that LHO lived in the neighborhood, liked watching movies, and that the theater provided a relief from the heat. These might not be reasons that convince you of the likelihood.
It’s contrived. I gave you an equally valid set of facts that argue against that likelihood. That’s why your methodology for determining likelihood is flawed. It will lead you to whatever conclusion you want.
(Nothing whatsoever is likely to convince you of anything.)
All it takes is evidence. Conjecture isn’t evidence.
But they most definitely are not “pure conjecture.”
The “facts” aren’t, but the conclusion you tried to draw from them certainly are.
Did Oswald “likely” go for swims in the Trinity River?