Let's get back for a second to your suggestion that Oswald might not have been wearing a jacket at all on Friday morning;
You said;
Two persons (Frazier and his sister) who saw what LHO was wearing to work that morning. Neither one of them say anything that would indicate that LHO was wearing CE 163. In fact Frazier says he has never seen it before when it is shown to him.
Yet you insist that is is a safe assumption that LHO was wearing CE 163 to work on Friday 11/22/63. I believe that you are the one not making any sense.
I have already quoted from Frazier's testimony that he did say Oswald was wearing a jacket.
And now Bill Chapman has added to his most recent post a part of Linnie Mae Randle's testimony, which I had forgotten about.
Mr. BALL. Here is another jacket which is a gray jacket, does this look anything like the jacket he had on?
Mrs. RANDLE. No, sir; I remember its being gray.
Mr. BALL. Well, this one is gray but of these two the jacket I last showed you is Commission Exhibit No. 162, and this blue gray is 163, now if you had to choose between these two?
Mrs. RANDLE. I would choose the dark one.
Mr. BALL. You would choose the dark one?
Mrs. RANDLE. Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL.
Which is 163, as being more similar to the jacket he had?Mrs. RANDLE.
Yes, sir; that I remember. But I, you know, didn't pay an awful lot of attention to his jacket. I remember his T-shirt and the shirt more so than I do the jacket.
Mr. BALL.
The witness just stated that 163 which is the gray-blue is similar to the jacket he had on. 162, the light gray jacket was not.Mrs. RANDLE.
Yes.Kinda destroys your entire argument, yet I am sure you will not see it that way and still soldier on with more speculation.
Perhaps you could try and find an explanation for how the grey jacket (CE 162) got to the rooming house on Friday morning, when Frazier said he saw Oswald wear his grey jacket to Irving on Thursday?