The Bus Stop Farce

[Martin Weidmann]

I explained why I asked you the question in a subsequent post. I am trying to decide how to categorize Hugh Aynesworth’s words.

And I agree with you that it really doesn’t make much difference other than that.

If it doesn't make much difference, why did you make such a big deal of it earlier?

[Charles Collins]

Not that I am aware of, but given the fact that CE 163 was later found at the TSBD and Oswald left the building without a jacket, it's a pretty safe bet to assume that he was wearing CE 163 on Friday morning.

Which of course only leaves the grey jacket CE 162 as the one he would have worn to Irving on Thursday.

I'm not sure where you're going with this, but it should be noted that nobody else but Roberts saw Oswald leave the rooming house either.

...it's a pretty safe bet to assume that he was wearing CE 163 on Friday morning.


Linnie Mae Randle affidavit 11/22/63:

“I didn’t see Lee again until this morning, Friday November 22, 1963, about 7:10 or 7:15 am. ... Lee was bareheaded, wearing a light brown or tan shirt.”

[Martin Weidmann]

...it's a pretty safe bet to assume that he was wearing CE 163 on Friday morning.

Linnie Mae Randle affidavit 11/22/63:

“I didn’t see Lee again until this morning, Friday November 22, 1963, about 7:10 or 7:15 am. ... Lee was bareheaded, wearing a light brown or tan shirt.”

What's your point?

Another witness who mistook a jacket for a shirt or the other way around, maybe? Just like Baker and.... Roberts, perhaps?

Or did Linnie Mae simply notice (and remembered) the color of the shirt and nothing else?

[Charles Collins]

What's your point?

Another witness who mistook a jacket for a shirt or the other way around, maybe? Just like Baker and.... Roberts, perhaps?

Or did Linnie Mae simply notice (and remembered) the color of the shirt and nothing else?

It would be difficult to mistake a light brown or tan shirt for this jacket. Your assumption isn’t so safe.

[Charles Collins]

Was that the "white' jacket found in the car park?

No, that is CE 162. This was found in the TSBD.

[Martin Weidmann]

It would be difficult to mistake a light brown or tan shirt for this jacket. Your assumption isn’t so safe.

Why would that be difficult. Early in the morning, probably just awake with the light of the sun, anything is possible, right?
Isn't it your argument that the color of CE 162 could appear different depending on the conditions it is seen?

And it doesn't even matter if my assumption is safe or not. Even if Oswald did not wear a jacket to work on Friday morning, CE 163 was still found at the TSBD, and Oswald left the TSBD on Friday without wearing a jacket.

So, I ask again, what's your point?

[Bill Chapman]

And tell us what makes you think I'm here to convince anyone of anything.

I never said you were. It's pretty obvious that you are not here to be convinced of anything or to convince anyone of anything because your one liners and "arguments" are too weak to convince even a 5 year old.

Which only begs the question why in fact you are here at all.

This forum is a come-one-come-all discussion platform, not a court of law. It's not even formal debate. Not my bad if you have a problem with why I'm here. Not my problem if you cannot get past me with your ultra-contrarian bluster.