No. I just asked the question: “ She just got mixed up thinking that it was before the first shot?”. The part before the ? seems to be what you are saying. The obvious answer would be: “not likely”. It’s a rhetorical device.
You need to read more carefully. It is you, not me, who thinks she is mixed up on that.
I am just pointing out that there is an awful lot of evidence that the second and third shots were in rapid succession with the second after the midpoint between 1 and 3. To fit the evidence the second must have struck JBC around z270. There are many other pieces of evidence that support a second shot striking JBC there. I didn’t manufacture the evidence. It’s there. I am just pointing it out.
OK. I'll give you this one. I didn't notice the question mark at the end of your sentence.
That doesn't change the fact that this is still the kind of mistake witnesses make when they try to piece together what happened from memory. She had no reason at the time to make a mental note of whether the first shot was fired before or after JFK turned to look to her. So taking your sentence as a question rather than a statement, my answer is yes, she got mixed up. We are talking about two events that occurred a little more than a second apart. Furthermore, when she got back to the DMN offices to write her account of the shooting, her colleagues described her as hysterical and she was given a tranquilizer before writing her account of the shooting. A perfectly understandable reaction to seeing the POTUS getting his brains blown out in front of her. She also said the shots came from over her right shoulder, i.e. the GK. Do you believe that part too?
https://kenrahn.com/JFK/The_critics/Whitmey/Witness.htmlThis is why I don't trust the eyewitness accounts. These people were already excited about seeing the POTUS up close and then suddenly, without warning, gunfire erupts. they see the POTUS slump over, and then less than five seconds later, they see his head explode. I think it would be very difficult for anyone to piece the details together of exactly what they saw and the order in which it occurred.
As for you insistence that the last 2 shots came in rapid succession, if that were true, there were two gunmen. The Carcano was not designed to fire two shots in rapid succession. The FBI determined it would take a minimum of 2.3 seconds between shots to fire an aimed shot. That is the theoretical minimum. If you actually are trying to hit a target, you wouldn't be trying to fire the rifle that rapidly. You would put the cross hairs on your aim point and keep it there while you put a slow steady squeeze on the trigger. The Z-film tells us there were almost 5 seconds between the last two shots. That is not rapid succession. Some even described the last two shots as being almost on top of each other. That certainly isn't two shots from the Carcano. What I suspect those people heard were two separate sounds from the same shot. Maybe an echo. Maybe the sonic boom from the bullet passing above them. Maybe the impact on JFK's skull. All of these sounds can be quite loud and be mistaken for a separate shot and they would all seem to be right on top of the muzzle blast. In fact, they would hear that sound first. I have experienced this phenomenon myself on a number of occasions. I have a neighbor who fires a muzzle loading rifle. There's no chance of firing two rapid fire shots, but when he's taking target practice, I sometimes hear a double sound, like two shots right on top of each other.
