Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?

[Bill Chapman]

The aliases exist. You just cannot show that Oswald ever used them as aliases for himself.
So what? I give the aliases top marks on the feasibility chart.

And how does how you see things have the slightest bit of relevance?
You sure spend a lot of time reading my 'irrelevancies'.

Do you see NFL football players as genuflecting and paying homage to the flag and country then?
Not Freakin' Likely

And even if I was paying homage, so what? Is that bad just because you think he killed people?
Where did I say it was bad? On the contrary, it's the gift that keeps on giving.

[John Iacoletti]

The aliases exist. You just cannot show that Oswald ever used them as aliases for himself.
So what? I give the aliases top marks on the feasibility chart.

What you think is feasible is not only irrelevant, it's not even interesting.

Do you see NFL football players as genuflecting and paying homage to the flag and country then?
Not Freakin' Likely

But the question is, is it "feasible"?

And even if I was paying homage, so what? Is that bad just because you think he killed people?
Where did I say it was bad? On the contrary, it's the gift that keeps on giving.

Back to to the incoherent rambling.  It's a "gift", but you can't articulate why it's so notable.

[Bill Chapman]

What you think is feasible is not only irrelevant, it's not even interesting.
Yet here you are 

But the question is, is it "feasible"?
Where did I equate feasibility with anything other than the aliases?

Back to to the incoherent rambling. It's a "gift", but you can't articulate why it's so notable.
A picture speaks a thousand words

[John Iacoletti]

What you think is feasible is not only irrelevant, it's not even interesting.
Yet here you are 

It's amusing to watch you try to be relevant and continually failing.

But the question is, is it "feasible"?
Where did I equate feasibility with anything other than the aliases?

Your "feasibility" standard is as worthless as everything else you come up with.

Back to to the incoherent rambling. It's a "gift", but you can't articulate why it's so notable.
A picture speaks a thousand words

Yeah, that's what I thought.  You bring it up every 5 minutes, but you can't even explain why.

The only "thousand words" around here are the ones from the delusional voices in your head.

[Bill Chapman]

It's amusing to watch you try to be relevant and continually failing.
Who appointed you arbiter of what's relevant?

Your "feasibility" standard is as worthless as everything else you come up with.
Who appointed you arbiter of standards?

Yeah, that's what I thought
Want some fries with that nothingburger?

You bring it up every 5 minutes, but you can't even explain why.
A picture is worth a thousand words

The only "thousand words" around here are the ones from the delusional voices in your head.
Your Oswald-kneeling fully reveals just who is delusional here.

[Bill Chapman]

Proof-of-your-irrelevance was achieved years ago so what's the point of continuing?

Again with the sticks & stones.. 

[John Iacoletti]

Who appointed you arbiter of what's relevant?

Let's have a show of hands.

Who appointed you arbiter of standards?

Let's have a show of hands.

Your Oswald-kneeling fully reveals just who is delusional here.

You can't even articulate exactly what you think it does "reveal" or why.  What's delusional about it?