Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory  (Read 49983 times)

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #84 on: April 04, 2021, 04:44:00 PM »
No assumption needed: There's no evidence of a second weapon being fired.

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Haven't you learned anything yet?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #85 on: April 04, 2021, 07:10:01 PM »
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Haven't you learned anything yet?

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
Like Oswald on the stairway..

Offline Michael Carney

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 203
Re: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #86 on: April 04, 2021, 07:55:03 PM »
Entry wound in JKF's throat proves more than one shooter. JFK getting hit with a frangible round in the head proves there was more than one shooter. If the bullet that hit JFK in the throat came through the windshield, that proves more than one shooter.
Summing it up, both JFK and JC were hit by bullet(s) coming from the rear of them. JFK's throat wound came from the front and the frangible round that hit JFK in the head came from the rear.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #87 on: April 05, 2021, 12:14:31 AM »
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
Like Oswald on the stairway..

BS.. the evidence of absence is Dorothy Garner not seeing anybody on or near the stairs between Adams & Styles going down and Truly & Baker coming up. Rankin didn't bury the Stroud letter for nothing!

You really don't know much about this case, don't you?
« Last Edit: April 05, 2021, 11:01:14 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #88 on: April 06, 2021, 01:04:31 AM »
BS.. the evidence of absence is Dorothy Garner not seeing anybody on or near the stairs between Adams & Styles going down and Truly & Baker coming up. Rankin didn't bury the Stroud letter for nothing!

You really don't know much about this case, don't you?

As usual, you're trying to turn the meaning of the term into a pretzel, you disingenuous troll. I know full well about Garner not hearing or seeing Oswald on the stairs.

Now, let me put this in a way as if I was addressing a 5-year old:

   'There, there, little Marty.. don't cry: Just because the nice lady didn't spy, with her little eye, the      bad man tippy-toeing past her door, (just after nice Mr. Kennedy fell down & broke his crown) that doesn't mean that the the bad man wasn't there'
« Last Edit: April 06, 2021, 01:59:22 AM by Bill Chapman »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #89 on: April 06, 2021, 01:58:39 AM »
As usual, you're trying to turn the meaning of the term into a pretzel, you disingenuous troll. I know full well about Garner not hearing or seeing Oswald on the stairs: Let me put this in a way as if I was addressing a 5-year old:

   'There, there, little Marty.. don't cry: Just because the nice lady didn't spy, with her little eye, the bad man tippy-toeing past her door, (just after nice Mr. Kennedy fell down & broke his crown) that doesn't mean that the the bad man wasn't there'

Is the ego thing playing up again? Talking down to people in a pathetically hysterical way is truly hilarious, especially when you just shot yourself in the foot once again.

Only an idiot would claim there is no evidence to support the claim that Oswald wasn't on the stairs and at the same time admit that he actually knows about the evidence (the Stroud letter) that destroys the claim that Oswald was actually on the stairs. Actually, if you had been to the building, as I have, before they sealed off the stairs you would know that there is no way Dorothy Garner, standing next to the stairs as she was, could have missed anybody going up or down.

Oh, I'm sorry, is that too much for your feeble mind to process?
« Last Edit: April 06, 2021, 02:25:52 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #90 on: April 06, 2021, 02:55:22 AM »
Is the ego thing playing up again? Talking down to people in a pathetically hysterical way is truly hilarious, especially when you just shot yourself in the foot once again.

Only an idiot would claim there is no evidence to support the claim that Oswald wasn't on the stairs and at the same time admit that he actually knows about the evidence (the Stroud letter) that destroys the claim that Oswald was actually on the stairs. Actually, if you had been to the building, as I have, before they sealed off the stairs you would know that there is no way Dorothy Garner, standing next to the stairs as she was, could have missed anybody going up or down.

Oh, I'm sorry, is that too much for your feeble mind to process?

LOL
--------------------------
'idiot'
'feeble mind'

Stop crying, little Marty
--------------------------

if you had been to the building, as I have, before they sealed off the stairs
I don't believe one gd word you say

'Dorothy Garner, standing next to the stairs as she was'
Standing in an open storage room at some point IIRC

'could have missed anybody going up or down'
Garner being fully concentrated, very professional, no screwing around (according to her fellow employees)
> like not screwing around by listening for steps on the stairs other than the 2 girls descending, for instance
« Last Edit: April 06, 2021, 03:04:25 AM by Bill Chapman »