Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory  (Read 12672 times)

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
Re: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #16 on: August 24, 2020, 02:01:17 AM »
Advertisement
This is embarrassing.  Let’s see the bottom.
OK----


Now seriously...the bottom end of a projectile will LOGICALLY be deformed upon firing.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #16 on: August 24, 2020, 02:01:17 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #17 on: August 24, 2020, 02:34:24 AM »
This is embarrassing. You show the very same photo ALL conspiracy types show. I know you have other photos. Let’s see the bottom.

Up and to the left*
Up and to the left
Up and to the left

'Pristine'... yeah, sure


*Inspiration: 'Back and to the left'
« Last Edit: August 24, 2020, 02:56:53 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #18 on: August 24, 2020, 02:54:54 AM »
OK----


You should wash your face before posting it.
And keep your mask on.
« Last Edit: August 24, 2020, 02:56:00 AM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #18 on: August 24, 2020, 02:54:54 AM »


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
Re: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #19 on: August 24, 2020, 07:07:28 AM »
Up and to the left
Is that how you like it?

Offline Joe Elliott

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1656
Re: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #20 on: August 24, 2020, 08:23:44 AM »

I believe this is perhaps the image that Jerry Freeman struggled to find:



Now seriously...the bottom end of a projectile will LOGICALLY be deformed upon firing.

If that deformation to the base of the bullet occurred upon firing the projectile, and not from striking Connally’s rib, the bullet would never had been able to pass through the barrel of the rifle.

Deformation upon firing, HA.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #20 on: August 24, 2020, 08:23:44 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #21 on: August 24, 2020, 12:55:59 PM »
Is that how you like it?

Not on my bucket list.
First time you ever saw the butt-end view of ce399?

Offline Ted Shields

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #22 on: August 24, 2020, 01:14:29 PM »
From a common sense point of view, why would "they" plant a near pristine bullet? Surely they would've known this would arouse suspicion? Why not plant a smashed up bullet?
« Last Edit: August 24, 2020, 01:16:55 PM by Ted Shields »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #22 on: August 24, 2020, 01:14:29 PM »


Offline Michael T. Griffith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 926
Re: Three Problems with the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #23 on: August 24, 2020, 03:21:06 PM »
From a common sense point of view, why would "they" plant a near pristine bullet? Surely they would've known this would arouse suspicion? Why not plant a smashed up bullet?

Because at that point no one knew that they were going to have to concoct the single-bullet theory. No one knew that Jackie was going to throw a monkey wrench into the cover-up plans by insisting that the autopsy be done at Bethesda instead of Walter Reed, as we now know from newly discovered Air Force One tapes.

And, yes, lots of bullets could make a 3-5 mm entry wound. You guys do realize that there are lots of other sizes of bullets besides 6.5 mm, right? Entry wounds in skin over soft tissue can be slightly smaller than the diameter of the bullet. So there is nothing unusual about a 3-5 mm entry wound in such cases.