The Dale Myers Blog

[Joe Elliott]

Mr. Elliott:
No one here, except you, has promoted such a bizarre, over the top scenario.

This scenario was an obvious joke.

Is there something wrong with questioning the story Mr. Brewer relates?

If you read the original affadavits of Brewer and Postal, you will see that their accounts of the whole scenario do not match up. They conflict, especially Brewer's remarks about Ms Postal.

P.S. Those affadavits make for good reading.

The accounts agree pretty closely.

[John Tonkovich]

This scenario was an obvious joke.



The accounts agree pretty closely.

Ah, the fallacious reductio ad absurdum.
( Mr Elliott is quite transparent.)

[John Iacoletti]

We now know that there was a broadcast on NBC News, probably soon repeated by all the radio stations, that an officer had by shot.

Must be a false memory.

[Bill Chapman]

This scenario was an obvious joke.



The accounts agree pretty closely.

'This scenario was an obvious joke.'

Not necessarily 'obviously'. Watch me post an 'Onion' spoof one of these days and see how the nuttier members here take it seriously.

The less-nutty CT veterans here will pretend to take an LN spoof seriously in an attempt to make the poster look even nuttier than themselves.

 

[Joe Elliott]

'This scenario was an obvious joke.'

Not necessarily 'obviously'. Watch me post an 'Onion' spoof one of these days and see how the nuttier members here take it seriously.

The less-nutty CT veterans here will pretend to take an LN spoof seriously in an attempt to make the poster look even nuttier than even themselves.

 

Are they capable of being honest? I just don’t get their thinking.

[Bill Brown]

What a raging hypocrite. Myers is one of the worst offenders of namecalling to anyone who dares to question one of his pronouncements.

Recently on Facebook, Myers claimed that the Seaport Traders order was received on March 13. When I asked him to substantiate that, he cited Michaelis’s testimony. When I pointed out that *nowhere* does Michaelis say that, he just doubled down and insisted that he was right.

So, you’re right, Joe. Myers has nothing to learn. Like most of his fellow evangelists, he thinks he has all the answers already.

No.

Michaelis doesn't have to literally pronounce that the order was received on the 13th.  Just read his testimony and if you use your common sense, you'll conclude that they did in fact receive the order on that date.

Iacoletti isn't really interested in finding the truth.  However, if any of you have questions about the issue of what date the order for the revolver was received, ask me and I'll elaborate.

[Bill Brown]

Maybe it’s a difference in the way CTers think.

If a tree falls in the forest, but nobody hears it, does it make a sound?

If Oswald enters a theater, but nobody sees him go through the doors, did he really enter the theater?

If Oswald carries a long package toward the TSBD, but nobody sees him enter the building with it, did he really enter the building with a long package?

If Oswald carries a long package toward the TSBD, but nobody sees him enter the building with it, did he really enter the building with a long package?

To add... Buell Frazier did say, in his affidavit, that when Oswald entered the back door (at the loading dock), he (Oswald) still had the package under his arm.