The Dale Myers Blog

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The Dale Myers Blog  (Read 40545 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: The Dale Myers Blog
« Reply #84 on: July 30, 2020, 02:45:13 PM »
Are they capable of being honest? I just don’t get their thinking.

If someone sincerely believes what they are saying, then they are in fact being honest.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: The Dale Myers Blog
« Reply #85 on: July 30, 2020, 02:52:59 PM »
No.

Michaelis doesn't have to literally pronounce that the order was received on the 13th.  Just read his testimony and if you use your common sense, you'll conclude that they did in fact receive the order on that date.

Iacoletti isn't really interested in finding the truth.  However, if any of you have questions about the issue of what date the order for the revolver was received, ask me and I'll elaborate.

Iacoletti takes the 'angel' out of 'evangelist'

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: The Dale Myers Blog
« Reply #86 on: July 30, 2020, 03:37:51 PM »
Why Tippit Would Have Stopped "Oswald" and the Alleged Change in Direction

Quote
According to Myers, as the assailant approached the corner of 10th and Patton, he saw Tippit's car coming up the street in his direction and therefore suddenly spun around and started walking in the opposite direction, which made Tippit suspicious of him (pp. 64-65). Myers cites William Scoggins' Warren Commission (WC) testimony, which does in fact imply a change in direction. However, Scoggins initially said nothing about any change in direction. When he was interviewed by the Secret Service on 12/2/63, he said,

I noticed a man walking west on 10th Street. . . . The man walking west on 10th Street stopped at a point just about directly in line with the front bumper of the police cruiser.

And just a second or two after the man stopped near the car's front bumper, he began talking with Tippit. Not a word or hint about any change in direction.
https://miketgriffith.com/files/malice.htm


Dale Myers at the scene [according to him] of the Tippit shooting--- in 1985 (left) and 2019 (right).

The Tippit shooting was not right at the street corner.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: The Dale Myers Blog
« Reply #87 on: July 30, 2020, 05:27:43 PM »
No.

Michaelis doesn't have to literally pronounce that the order was received on the 13th.  Just read his testimony and if you use your common sense, you'll conclude that they did in fact receive the order on that date.

"common sense" is what people claim when they don't have any actual evidence and want to pretend that conjecture is evidence.

No.  Myers stated as a fact in his blog article that "Seaport Traders also received Oswald’s mail-order for the .38 caliber revolver on March 13, 1963".  He was wrong to state this as a fact and his gigantic ego didn't allow him to admit it.

Quote
Iacoletti isn't really interested in finding the truth.  However, if any of you have questions about the issue of what date the order for the revolver was received, ask me and I'll elaborate.

"Truth" is not defined as Bill Brown's (or Dale Myers') "common sense" assumptions.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: The Dale Myers Blog
« Reply #88 on: July 30, 2020, 05:33:31 PM »

To add... Buell Frazier did say, in his affidavit, that when Oswald entered the back door (at the loading dock), he (Oswald) still had the package under his arm.

Buell Frazier said in his interview with Tom Meros that by the time Oswald reached the door to the north annex, he could no longer see the package.


Offline John Tonkovich

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 732
Re: The Dale Myers Blog
« Reply #89 on: July 30, 2020, 06:03:46 PM »
'This scenario was an obvious joke.'

Not necessarily 'obviously'. Watch me post an 'Onion' spoof one of these days and see how the nuttier members here take it seriously.

The less-nutty CT veterans here will pretend to take an LN spoof seriously in an attempt to make the poster look even nuttier than themselves.

 ;D
Mr Elliott is making a fallacious argument using " reductio ad absurdum".
Look it up, you might learn something.

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: The Dale Myers Blog
« Reply #90 on: July 30, 2020, 08:39:30 PM »


Michaelis doesn't have to literally pronounce that the order was received on the 13th [March].  Just read his testimony and if you use your common sense, you'll conclude that they did in fact receive the order on that date.

Iacoletti isn't really interested in finding the truth.  However, if any of you have questions about the issue of what date the order for the revolver was received, ask me and I'll elaborate.
The truth about what?
Quote
January 28, 1962: LHO orders a .38 caliber Smith and Wesson revolver by mail. [Should be 1963]
March 9-10, 1963: LHO takes photographs of the home of General Edwin Walker, a right-wing activist.
[It was not proven that he actually took those pictures]
March 12, 1963: Ruth Paine visits Marina at the new apartment. Also that day, LHO orders a rifle from Klein's Sporting Goods in Chicago.
 March 20, 1963: The rifle and the revolver are shipped.
[On the same day? What are the odds?]
 March 25, 1963: LHO picks up the weapons.
[Both guns arrive and are 'picked up the same day...What again are the odds?]
http://jfkassassination.net/parnell/chrono.htm