A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.  (Read 164518 times)

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.
« Reply #189 on: February 21, 2019, 10:38:29 PM »
It was also noted that JFK sustained damage to his C7 vertebrae.

You are wrong. I did take into consideration the 17 degree downward angle of the bullet's trajectory.



And that was with only a slight lean forward. Kennedy was hunched forward from between 11? and 18?.

You're going to lose this one. I know you took the 17 deg angle into account. So did I. So where does that place the back wound? Too high right? So where does going thru T1 place the throat wound? Too low right? That's the dilemma. Prove me wrong.

Also, you are the one relying on perspective to place points of entry/exit. Toss all that out and look for physical reference points, such as the scapula bulge, etc. That has been my mantra, otherwise, slouch shmouch. Rotate your head any way you like, but this can only be resolved with a re-enactment. Then you can place a surrogate in any damn position you like that makes it work.

When are you cheap bastages going to splurge on a 2nd laser pointer and do the damn experiment for yourselves? It's the ONLY way to advance this discussion then you can shut all us CTs TFU!



Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.
« Reply #190 on: February 22, 2019, 12:02:01 AM »
You're going to lose this one. I know you took the 17 deg angle into account. So did I. So where does that place the back wound? Too high right? So where does going thru T1 place the throat wound? Too low right? That's the dilemma. Prove me wrong.

The bullet never went through T1 or C7. I'm not convinced that either of the two vertebrae were actually damaged. The experts who examined the X-Rays were not all in agreement on those points. If they were damaged, then it was from the shockwave created by the bullet as it passed close by.

The bullet entered at the level of C7 and exited at the level of C7. Prove me wrong.

Offline Steve Barber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 518
Re: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.
« Reply #191 on: February 24, 2019, 11:34:51 PM »
You're going to lose this one. I know you took the 17 deg angle into account. So did I. So where does that place the back wound? Too high right? So where does going thru T1 place the throat wound? Too low right? That's the dilemma. Prove me wrong.

Also, you are the one relying on perspective to place points of entry/exit. Toss all that out and look for physical reference points, such as the scapula bulge, etc. That has been my mantra, otherwise, slouch shmouch. Rotate your head any way you like, but this can only be resolved with a re-enactment. Then you can place a surrogate in any damn position you like that makes it work.

When are you cheap bastages going to splurge on a 2nd laser pointer and do the damn experiment for yourselves? It's the ONLY way to advance this discussion then you can shut all us CTs TFU!




  When are you people going to stop it with placing Kennedy in a chair, sitting straight up, arms at the side  and so forth, to try to make a point?

 You simply cannot do this.  JFK Wasn't seated anywhere near the position of your laser beam figure.  JFK's legs were bent, and up against the seat of Connally.  His right arm is resting on the side rail of the car, which has to be taken into consideration.  He was not sitting straight up and down like your laser beam figure.   Period.  And this makes a big difference. 

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5010
Re: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.
« Reply #192 on: February 25, 2019, 06:12:10 AM »

  When are you people going to stop it with placing Kennedy in a chair, sitting straight up, arms at the side  and so forth, to try to make a point?

 You simply cannot do this.  JFK Wasn't seated anywhere near the position of your laser beam figure.  JFK's legs were bent, and up against the seat of Connally.  His right arm is resting on the side rail of the car, which has to be taken into consideration.  He was not sitting straight up and down like your laser beam figure.   Period.  And this makes a big difference.

        After a while this gets ridiculous. (1) JFK's Jacket was "bunched", (2) JFK's Shirt was "Bunched", and now (3) JFK was "Slouched" over. Remember, we are discussing the POTUS, Not a skid row bum sleeping one off.
« Last Edit: February 25, 2019, 06:13:21 AM by Royell Storing »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.
« Reply #193 on: February 26, 2019, 08:30:30 PM »
JFK and Connally were, by definition, in whatever positions are required to make the SBT work.  Same goes for the location of the entry wound in JFK's back.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.
« Reply #194 on: February 28, 2019, 09:42:30 PM »
        After a while this gets ridiculous. (1) JFK's Jacket was "bunched", (2) JFK's Shirt was "Bunched", and now (3) JFK was "Slouched" over. Remember, we are discussing the POTUS, Not a skid row bum sleeping one off.

Now (3) JFK was "Slouched" over? You really think that's something new?

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5010
Re: A scientific look at the Single Bullet Theory.
« Reply #195 on: March 01, 2019, 12:42:44 AM »
Now (3) JFK was "Slouched" over? You really think that's something new?

     Why not just stand the guy on his head?