Then went outside to watch P. parade

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Then went outside to watch P. parade  (Read 71770 times)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5031
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade
« Reply #133 on: May 24, 2020, 07:58:33 PM »
Indeed so, Mr Storing-----------notes written by Agent Hosty on the basis of Mr Oswald's first interrogation. The fact that they make you antsy is immaterial to their evidentiary value!  Thumb1:

Now! If your claim is that Mr Oswald never actually claimed these things, then it is up to you to explain your basis for such an extraordinary claim.

Nope-------------you would wave your hand and haughtily declare all Visual Evidence UNtrustworthy. Part of the ridiculous firewall you have built up around evidence you don't like.

No offense, Mr Storing but your lack of objectivity is your fatal flaw. Well, that and the fact that you never do any, yannow, work. You prefer to sit back and play self-appointed Arbiter of the Truth. The act is wearing thin!

   The only "antsy" thing about me is having "Stung" You. NOTHING Documents: (1) WHO Specifically wrote the notes, or (2) WHEN Specifically these notes were applied to the back of a DPD Affidavit Form. There's a difference between being "objective" and "capricious". You need to establish the Provenance of the Notes. Verifying the handwriting on the notes as being that of Hosty would be an excellent Step 1.   
   Bearing in mind how "Objective" YOU are, would You be interested in Buying a couple of Original Picasso's I have hanging on my wall?   
« Last Edit: May 24, 2020, 08:00:19 PM by Royell Storing »

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade
« Reply #134 on: May 24, 2020, 09:21:52 PM »
(1) WHO Specifically wrote the notes,

Agent Hosty, obviously. If you believe there are legitimate grounds for doubt about this, lay out these grounds for us here and now!

Quote
(2) WHEN Specifically these notes were applied to the back of a DPD Affidavit Form.

11/22/63, after the first interrogation of Mr Oswald, obviously. If you believe there are legitimate grounds for doubt about this, lay out these grounds for us here and now!

The floor's all yours, Mr Storing!  Thumb1:

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade
« Reply #135 on: May 24, 2020, 09:54:51 PM »
Agent Hosty, obviously. If you believe there are legitimate grounds for doubt about this, lay out these grounds for us here and now!

11/22/63, after the first interrogation of Mr Oswald, obviously. If you believe there are legitimate grounds for doubt about this, lay out these grounds for us here and now!

The floor's all yours, Mr Storing!  Thumb1:

Obviously?

--  MWT  ;)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5031
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade
« Reply #136 on: May 24, 2020, 10:14:21 PM »
Agent Hosty, obviously. If you believe there are legitimate grounds for doubt about this, lay out these grounds for us here and now!

11/22/63, after the first interrogation of Mr Oswald, obviously. If you believe there are legitimate grounds for doubt about this, lay out these grounds for us here and now!

The floor's all yours, Mr Storing!  Thumb1:

     I thought these "Hosty NOTES" were supposed to be the actual notes that Hosty wrote down DURING the 1st Q/A of Oswald.  Are You sticking with these Notes being written down "AFTER"? If so, How Long "AFTER" that 1st Q/A was this done? Also, if this was done AFTER the 1st Q/A, they are NOT Notes. This might be a "Draft" or a "Copy" to some degree. "Degree" being of IMPORTANCE. 

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade
« Reply #137 on: May 25, 2020, 01:47:44 AM »
    Until a handwriting Expert verifies these Notes to be Hostys', No One can claim as Fact who penned them. This is a slippery slope. Where do You draw the line? Like a court of law, an Expert needs to do the Verification before these Notes are declared as FACT to be Hostys'.

That’s not unlike getting an astrology “expert” to verify that if you are an Aquarius you will soon come into a lot of money.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5031
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade
« Reply #138 on: May 25, 2020, 01:59:28 AM »

  Well, a "handwriting expert" would certainly be a Step-Up from the Novices we currently have Validating these Notes as being Hosty's. I also do NOT like that NOW we are hearing these NOTES may have actually been a Copy of some kind that was composed at some Unknown point in time AFTER the Oswald Q/A. These so-called "Hosty Notes" are rapidly falling apart.

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade
« Reply #139 on: May 25, 2020, 07:21:13 AM »
     I thought these "Hosty NOTES" were supposed to be the actual notes that Hosty wrote down DURING the 1st Q/A of Oswald.  Are You sticking with these Notes being written down "AFTER"? If so, How Long "AFTER" that 1st Q/A was this done? Also, if this was done AFTER the 1st Q/A, they are NOT Notes. This might be a "Draft" or a "Copy" to some degree. "Degree" being of IMPORTANCE.

Oh, do try to keep up, Mr Storing!

These are notes jotted down by Agent Hosty during the interrogation:



This is from Agent Hosty's draft report, written after the interrogation----------------



----------------but before the alibi-suppressing joint report which he and Agent Bookhout produced together.

Get it now?