Then went outside to watch P. parade

[Alan Ford]

Martin, I can claim Batman was on the front steps of the TSBD, but I cannot corroborate it. My point is this is more old nonsense and not evidence. 56 year old conspiracy BS.

You can indeed claim Batman was on the front steps of the TSBD, but the fact that he is a fictional character means your claim will be a non-starter.

I can claim Mr Charles Brehm was on the front steps of the TSBD, but his proven location elsewhere in Dealey Plaza at that time means my claim will a non-starter.
 
You problem here, Mr May, is that you can't counter the claim Mr Oswald was on the front steps of the TSBD with the simple words 'I can prove he was at the SN window'. All you have is 56 year old LN BS. This must really hurt!

 

[Paul May]

What exactly are you referring to as '56 year old crap', Mr May? Agent Hosty's clear record of what Mr Oswald claimed in custody? Or Mr Oswald's claim itself?

Yes.

Do you have any photographic corroboration for your 56 year old crap? Thought not!

 

I’ve said often, I will not be drawn into the conspiracy madness any longer. The physical evidence closed this case long ago. If and when something, anything new appears let me know. I won’t hold my breath.

[Alan Ford]

I’ve said often, I will not be drawn into the conspiracy madness any longer. The physical evidence closed this case long ago. If and when something, anything new appears let me know. I won’t hold my breath.

[Paul May]

Nothing new. Got it.

[Royell Storing]

Hardly! It's what Mr Oswald himself claimed......... an inordinate effort went into hiding this claim from the world and misrepresenting his words........ and your attempts to uncouple this claim from the fake shadow down Mr Lovelady in Wiegman have been pathetically weak.

Stop playing games, Mr Storing! You have declared Mr Frazier an utterly untrustworthy witness. If he were to confirm Mr Oswald's presence on the steps, you would refuse to believe him. And if some new witness were to come forward with 3 crisp, clear Polaroid photographs showing Mr Oswald in the doorway, we all know what your reaction would be: you would revert to your usual darkly authoritative but perfectly incoherent mumblings about how None of the Visual Record is to be Trusted.

You have, in short, an irrational desire to keep Mr Oswald out of that entranceway. But he was there, and there's not a damn thing you can do about it. Sorry! 

    Let's Hold-It-Up here. YOU claim, "It's what Mr Oswald HIMSELF Claimed". THAT is Flat-Out WRONG! We have the backside of a  DPD Affidavit Form with NOTES on it. THIS is NOT, "Mr Oswald HIMSELF"! When you make Blatantly Incorrect Declarations like that, you then cast doubt on ALL of the other fine work You have previously done.  I would welcome, "3 crisp, clear Polaroid photographs showing Mr Oswald in the doorway....". That would beat the heck out of Undocumented Notes on the Back of a DPD Affidavit Form.

[Alan Ford]

Nothing new. Got it.

Mr May really doesn't want to debate the significance of this!



 

[Alan Ford]

    Let's Hold-It-Up here. YOU claim, "It's what Mr Oswald HIMSELF Claimed". THAT is Flat-Out WRONG! We have the backside of a  DPD Affidavit Form with NOTES on it.

Indeed so, Mr Storing-----------notes written by Agent Hosty on the basis of Mr Oswald's first interrogation. The fact that they make you antsy is immaterial to their evidentiary value! 

Now! If your claim is that Mr Oswald never actually claimed these things, then it is up to you to explain your basis for such an extraordinary claim.

THIS is NOT, "Mr Oswald HIMSELF"! When you make Blatantly Incorrect Declarations like that, you then cast doubt on ALL of the other fine work You have previously done.  I would welcome, "3 crisp, clear Polaroid photographs showing Mr Oswald in the doorway....". That would beat the heck out of Undocumented Notes on the Back of a DPD Affidavit Form.

Nope-------------you would wave your hand and haughtily declare all Visual Evidence UNtrustworthy. Part of the ridiculous firewall you have built up around evidence you don't like.

No offense, Mr Storing but your lack of objectivity is your fatal flaw. Well, that and the fact that you never do any, yannow, work. You prefer to sit back and play self-appointed Arbiter of the Truth. The act is wearing thin!