Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read  (Read 69389 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #35 on: April 24, 2020, 04:07:43 PM »

Thanks for posting the Tink Thompson presentation......  I believe that Thompson is 100% correct in his final conclusion.....  He said that the more a person investigates the assassination the murkier it becomes.....  And I believe that is true IF a person can't see the reason that the case becomes more confused and murkier.... 

And that reason is because the conspirators and the investigators were one and the same.....  With J. Edgar Hoover at the controls.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #36 on: April 24, 2020, 04:30:48 PM »
IMO, the entire row of people on the north side of Elm street are unusually still.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #37 on: April 24, 2020, 04:37:26 PM »

Here he explains how he made a mistake years ago:


Not a valid vimeo URL

Maybe your couple of points that you want to discuss are addressed in that video.

Charlie.....I'm having trouble playing the video .....  It stops at various points and won't restart.... I'd really like to see the entire video..... Is anybody else experiencing problems?
« Last Edit: April 24, 2020, 04:47:00 PM by Walt Cakebread »

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #38 on: April 24, 2020, 04:48:54 PM »
IMO, the entire row of people on the north side of Elm street are unusually still.

Interesting observation, I think that could be due to an earlier missed shot that they heard and were mentally trying to figure out...

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #39 on: April 24, 2020, 04:53:45 PM »
Charlie.....I'm having trouble playing the video .....  It stops at various points and won't restart.... I'd really like to see the entire video..... Is anybody else experiencing problems?

It played fine for me yesterday. I do have a fast internet connection though. I’ll try again and if it is acting up for me now I’ll let you know. Otherwise, I will not respond.

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #40 on: April 24, 2020, 05:00:06 PM »
What misrepresentations. Ford merely changed the "below the shoulder" description (what does that mean? Below the shoulder line? Below the shoulder muscle mass?) to the base of the back of the neck description in the autopsy report. Ford was making things MORE accurate.

Clyde Snow developed the confusing theory that the wound track was upward in an anatomical-position model. Adjustments based on the films and photos were then made to determine the body position at the time of the wounding. The missile track then went downwards from the back to the front.

Critics like to content the "upward" trajectory occurred at the time of the wounding. But that's not what Snow was arguing. Read HSCA Volume VI, beginning page 43 ( Link ).

BS.

Can you point to the Z-frame when he was hit in the back of the neck?

Cyril Wecht pointed out during the HSCA proceedings:
Unless JFK bent over to tie his shoes when he went behind the Stemmons sign and got shot in that position, then straightened back up before emerging, the wound in his back is on a upward trajectory.

Even the WC commission new the back wound was lower than the throat wound.



Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Six Seconds in Dallas-- Old book, a must read
« Reply #41 on: April 24, 2020, 06:09:56 PM »
BS.

Can you point to the Z-frame when he was hit in the back of the neck?

Cyril Wecht pointed out during the HSCA proceedings:
Unless JFK bent over to tie his shoes when he went behind the Stemmons sign and got shot in that position, then straightened back up before emerging, the wound in his back is on a upward trajectory.

Even the WC commission new the back wound was lower than the throat wound.






The back wound was moved up from "below the shoulder blade to the right of the spine " to the neck by Gerald R Ford.....An "EX" FBI agent who was a spy for J.E Hoover on the warren Commission....  Ford was rewarded for his derailing of the investigation by free room and board in our White house....