Oswald killed Tippit -- Helen Markham confirms her ID on CBS 1964

[John Iacoletti]

I posted a video of someone who was (1964).

How many other experts disagreed with your "expert"....  Isn't it a fact that several other experts swore that the bullets could NOT be traced to that big bore, short barrel, revolver ??

Yes.  7 other firearms experts for the WC and HSCA to be exact.  But of course the LNers cite Nicol.

[Ross Lidell]

That's what people without any good evidence always say.

I provided evidence: Audio/visual testimony on video.

According to you: Every piece of evidence (without exception) is NOT good evidence.

[Ross Lidell]

Yes.  7 other firearms experts for the WC and HSCA to be exact.  But of course the LNers cite Nicol.

You ignored the "class characteristics" question.

[John Iacoletti]

Name "the experts" who swore that the bullets could NOT be traced to that big bore, short barrel, revolver

Robert A. Frazier
Cortlandt Cunningham
John S. Bates, Jr.
Donald E. Champagne
Monty C. Lutz
Andrew M. Newquist
George R. Wilson

AND swore that the bullets could be absolutely excluded from that gun based on having different class characteristics?

That's not what he said, Mr. Strawman.

[Rick Plant]

No it is not vague. The man takes 70 seconds to explain the difficulty of the ballistics match of the projectiles.

Yes it is vague. If it wasn't you would have a slam dunk case. Speculation never proved anything.   

I'm not going list all the points he made. You need to rebut Joseph D. Nichols conclusions point-by-point: Otherwise you're just another contrarian.

Well, this is your propaganda so you need to make your case. The reason you refuse is because you have flimsy evidence.   

Incidentally, your brief, incorrect statement is actually "vague" too. What irony!

If you had solid evidence then you would have a case. Nothing you've shown proves anything about Oswald.     

The Video concludes with text stating: "Joseph D. Nicol's expert ballistics evidence SUPPORTS other evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald murdered Office J.D. Tippit".

 

That isn't proof of anything.

[John Iacoletti]

I provided evidence: Audio/visual testimony on video.

The only thing that's evidence of is that Markham picked Oswald out of a biased, unfair lineup.

According to you: Every piece of evidence (without exception) is NOT good evidence.

According to you, every piece of questionable, arguable, tainted circumstantial evidence is good solid evidence.

[John Iacoletti]

You ignored the "class characteristics" question.

That's because "class characteristics" is BS rhetoric to make up for an inability to match them to a specific weapon.