In Search of the Childhood Lee

[Walt Cakebread]

Source of record...Warren Report
I couldn't immediately find an entry for '51-'52 anywhere.
 
In contrast to the description of a youngster mentioned in the opening post....https://www.school-for-champions.com/biographies/lee_harvey_oswald.htm#.Xoll3XJOmUl
If someone would bother to review the testimony of John Pic....they would not find any such statement except that Mrs Pic told her husband about some knife incident. As usual, any vilification of Oswald stood paramount.   

As usual, any vilification of Oswald stood paramount.   

That's right.....And who do you think twisted this minor disagreement into a major incident?   

Marguerite said the incident was not a threat with a knife at all..... Lee had received a new pocket knife and he had it his hand admiring it as a boy will do, when her daughter in law started hassling Lee about some program that Lee was watching on TV, and in responding to Pic's wife he waved the knife around .....

[Jerry Freeman]

Incredibly racist.

Also incredibly stupid and off topic.

[John Tonkovich]

Thanks, Mr. Scully.

Interestingly enough, there were two Mrs. M. Oswalds. Robert Oswald Sr.'s first wife was named , oddly enough, Margaret. He divorced her to marry Marguerite; however, the first Mrs. Oswald retained her married name for awhile after the divorce.
In reality, that's about the only "two Oswalds" you'll ever find.

[Walt Cakebread]

Nagell was the only survivor, after the bomber reportedly flew into the ground at a rather high rate of speed.





John, presenting "the divide" in the most favorable light, IOW, attempting to give every forum participant the benefit of the doubt, it seems some hold themselves to a looser standard of proof not necessarily to mislead, but to provoke thought. David Joseph is replying to my posted observation that Dick Russell revised his convictions about Richard Nagell's claims, because:



David Josephs is replying to my analysis, don't go beyond Dick Russell's guidance.:

https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/thread-14015-post-100820.html#pid100820

Finally, the bottom right of the photo where it appears to say JUL is not part of the stamp that appears to say OCT 23, 1963 but part of the photo - which is also not similar to the stamps of the time

I'd suggest that you're not scrutinizing that card (N 4,271,617 ) .....If you get a magnifying glass and LOOK at the lower right of the photo you'll see UARTER written backwards.   That "stamp was made by using a US QUARTER dollar coin, an ink pad and a date stamp.

[Tom Scully]

Finally, the bottom right of the photo where it appears to say JUL is not part of the stamp that appears to say OCT 23, 1963 but part of the photo - which is also not similar to the stamps of the time

I'd suggest that you're not scrutinizing that card (N 4,271,617 ) .....If you get a magnifying glass and LOOK at the lower right of the photo you'll see UARTER written backwards.   That "stamp was made by using a US QUARTER dollar coin, an ink pad and a date stamp.

Walt, you are replying to David Josephs' observation about the I.D. stamp. He is not posting in this thread.

I ran across the testimony of a Mrs Mildred Sawyer which was taken in New Orleans...
Mrs Sawyer was a neighbor of Marguerite back in the early '50s.Twice.... Mrs Sawyer mentions a youth with BLONDE--CURLY--HAIR ...and described a polite and apparently obedient child.
Are we talking about this youngster....?

 

Oswald turned 16 years old in October, 1955. Jerry, I don't observe you presenting much of anything in this thread, since your OP. At first I anticipated you had an argument to make. You seem distracted, possibly because your OP is misleading. As I posted earlier, Oswald was precisely one year from military enlistment. For the most part, the images displayed in the OP do not reflect what Mildred Sawyer's earliest statements describe.

https://www.maryferrell.org/search.html?q=sawyer%20and%20%2214%20or%2015%20years%22&docset=1687

[Walt Cakebread]

Walt, you are replying to David Josephs' observation about the I.D. stamp. He is not posting in this thread.

Oswald turned 16 years old in October, 1955. Jerry, I don't observe you presenting much of anything in this thread, since your OP. At first I anticipated you had an argument to make. You seem distracted, possibly because your OP is misleading. As I posted earlier, Oswald was precisely one year from military enlistment. For the most part, the images displayed in the OP do not reflect what Mildred Sawyer's earliest statements describe.

https://www.maryferrell.org/search.html?q=sawyer%20and%20%2214%20or%2015%20years%22&docset=1687

It makes no difference..... I'm calling attention yo that "stamp" on the bottom of the photo.....

[John Iacoletti]

As usual, any vilification of Oswald stood paramount.   

That's right.....And who do you think twisted this minor disagreement into a major incident?   

Marguerite said the incident was not a threat with a knife at all..... Lee had received a new pocket knife and he had it his hand admiring it as a boy will do, when her daughter in law started hassling Lee about some program that Lee was watching on TV, and in responding to Pic's wife he waved the knife around .....

Kinda like when a cop tries to grope your waist and you take a swing at him in self defense and he says “hey, did you all see that? He punched me in the nose and tried to shoot me!”