Did Oswald run (rather than walk) to 10th and Patton?

[Walt Cakebread]

Eventually he did.  Not in his original statement.

I'd bet a large sum that this typed up "affidavit was not signed by Willam Whaley.   



The handwriting looks to be that of Patsy Collins.....

[Jerry Freeman]

Mr. BELIN. Did you sign an affidavit for the Dallas Police Department?
Mr. WHALEY. Yes, sir.
Mr. BELIN. I will hand you a document which I am calling Whaley Deposition Exhibit A, and ask you to say if your signature appears on there?
Mr. WHALEY. Yes, sir; that is my signature.
Mr. BELIN. Now I notice in the statement there it says that you traveled Wood Street to Houston Street, turned left and went over the viaduct to Zangs Boulevard. You see that statement there?
Mr. WHALEY. Yes.
Mr. BELIN. "Traveled Zangs to Beckley and turned left and traveled on Beckley until I reached the 500 block of North Beckley. When I got in the 500 block of North Beckley he said this will do and I stopped."
Now is that what you told them on that day?
Mr. WHALEY. Yes, sir; that is what I told them on that day.
Mr. BELIN. Well, was that the fact that you drove until you reached the 500 block, or not?
Mr. WHALEY. No, sir, I didn't drive until I reached the 500 block. I drove until I reached Beckley and Neely. If you would be in my place when they took me down there, when they had to force their way through the reporters to get me in the office, they wrote that up, and I signed it, because I told them that the man said he wanted to go to the 500 block of North Beckley.

Can you say "Bullied'?

[Joffrey van de Wiel]

I'd bet a large sum that this typed up "affidavit was not signed by Willam Whaley.   



The handwriting looks to be that of Patsy Collins.....

I was looking at it and had the exact same idea. Eerily similar.

[Jerry Freeman]

When eyewitness accounts conflict with each other, the accounts that agree with the physical evidence should have greater weight. And accounts given immediately after an event are often the more accurate accounts.

The Oswald did its want to butter their bread on both sides. Allegedly Oswald did it--- guilt by accusation ...so anything or anyone that contradicts that conclusion must be in error. The Whaley affidavit was made fairly immediately after the event but by the time he went to testimony..Whaley had been razzed to no end. The Feds had him re-drive the route [until he "got it right"]
From Oswald's Jacket....

Here's where you knuckle heads don't get it. Oswald wasn't convicted of anything. He never went to trial. He never even got to talk to a lawyer before being lynched.

Hitler never went to trial, was he also innocent? Hahaha!

Mental.