Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.  (Read 281187 times)

Offline Ross Lidell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 451
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #588 on: March 25, 2020, 01:53:24 AM »
Mike Paine was instrumental in the framing of Lee Oswald......

Wow! Details please Walt.

Here's a helpful starting point: During 1963, Michael Paine was employed as an engineer at Bell Helicopter in Arlington Texas. Bell Helicopter was part of the military-industrial complex. I cannot get beyond that: Maybe you can?
« Last Edit: March 25, 2020, 10:20:01 PM by Ross Lidell »

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #589 on: March 25, 2020, 02:50:37 AM »


How come there are only 2 [empty] shells and one live round in the display?
I've seen similar photos in Mexican crime tabloids.
How tacky is that?

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #590 on: March 25, 2020, 06:21:00 AM »


How come there are only 2 [empty] shells and one live round in the display?
I've seen similar photos in Mexican crime tabloids.
How tacky is that?

Look in Fritz's pocket.

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #591 on: March 25, 2020, 01:25:46 PM »
Mike Paine was instrumental in the framing of Lee Oswald......


Is that because he did the obvious things someone trying to frame Oswald would do like confirming Oswald owned a rifle and stored it in the garage, hated JFK, and was a violent nut job?  This is where you don't understand the point but tell me he didn't do those things. 
« Last Edit: March 25, 2020, 08:44:59 PM by Richard Smith »

Online Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1872
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #592 on: March 25, 2020, 02:21:49 PM »

Is that because he did the obvious things someone trying to frame Oswald would do like confirming Oswald owned a rifle and stored it in the garage, hated JFK, and was a violent nut job?  This where you don't understand the point but tell me he didn't do those things.
We've asked these type of questions repeatedly - it's one way of looking at the assassination from a different perspective, as a sort of attempt at proving a negative - and every time these "Why didn't?" type questions are asked the conspiracy believers and the so-called "undecideds" get quite angry and upset. Very angry. They don't like these questions. Not a bit.

If a person is truly interested in taking this event apart, in looking at it inside and out, upside down, as a sort of intellectual exercise then these types of questions should be welcomed.

How can one prove a negative? That is, that Marina wasn't coerced into lying about Oswald? Okay, how about asking the question that if she was coerced why didn't she say he hated JFK? Or that she saw him with the rifle that morning? The same can be asked about the Paines. If they were part of this framing then why didn't they more fully implicate Oswald?

Again, these are legitimate questions. Except for those who are unwilling to consider the possibility that their conspiracy beliefs are flat out nonsense. Which they are.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #593 on: March 25, 2020, 02:52:04 PM »
Wow! Details please Walt.

Here's a helpful starting point: During 1963, Michael Paine was employed as an engineer at Bell Helicopter in Irving Texas. Bell Helicopter was part of the military-industrial complex. I cannot get beyond that: Maybe you can?

On the night of 11/22/63 Mike Paine showed Captain Fritz a BY photo .... (133c)  Fritz asked him if he knew where the photo was taken, but apparently Paine didn't know where the photo had been taken, so Fritz displayed the photo to Lee Oswald and asked him where the photo had been taken ...Lee told Fritz that the photo was a fake....

I'm sure you know that the back yard photo shows Lee Oswald holding a Mannlicher Carcano  like the one the FBI claimed was the murder weapon.


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #594 on: March 25, 2020, 04:22:23 PM »

Is that because he did the obvious things someone trying to frame Oswald would do like confirming Oswald owned a rifle and stored it in the garage, hated JFK, and was a violent nut job?  This where you don't understand the point but tell me he didn't do those things.

You're an idiot Mr "Smith"......   You simpleton....  Didn't Mike Paine claim that he didn't know anything about a rifle in Lee's possession??  And yet YOU Mr "Smith" just wrote....." he did the obvious things someone trying to frame Oswald would do like confirming Oswald owned a rifle and stored it in the garage,"

How could Mike Paine have done that if he didn't know about the rifle in the blanket???   Hmmmmm?

hated JFK,   Really, Mr "Smith"?? ...Do you think that Mike Paine knew Lee better than Marina??    Marina testified that Lee admired JFK.....

was a violent nut job?

Mr "Smith"  Are you referring to the same man who had a confrontation with Carlos Bringuer, the anti Castro Cuban, on the street in New Orleans.  Are you referring to that " violent" man ?   The one who never raised a hand to defend himself ........ 

You're not the sharpest tool in the shed...are you Mr. "Smith"
« Last Edit: March 25, 2020, 04:39:34 PM by Walt Cakebread »