Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.  (Read 280991 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #357 on: March 09, 2020, 07:39:44 PM »
It seems just a few months were sufficient to dull memories of trained police doesn't it? Unfortunately we have an unsatisfactory evidence base to work with. Pity the WC staffers were unable to help with clarification. I understand your reluctance to look for a logical answers to the questions posed. I believe you appreciate my desire for them to be answered.

At least you stepped up to represent a normally vocal group. It seems the WC narrative has Oswald transporting a disassembled rifle in a paper bag with only one end sealed. He folded the bag an unknown number of times and left it next to a box he sat on to shoot the President. The crime lab discovered remnants of a chicken lunch and assumed it to be Oswald'sfor some time after the event. After assisting Day with the rifle discovery Studebaker returned to the SN. Day left the building with the rifle. Studebaker dusted the bottle on the sixth floor and not the lunch sack. He moved to the SN and about this time Johnson claimed the bag was unfolded. Eventually dusted for prints by Studebaker it was removed by Johnson and Montgomery before Day returned to the TSBD.

'the WC staffers'

IIRC, at least one staffer stated something to the effect that they were all trying like hell to find a conspiracy, adding something like that it would do wonders for their individual careers going forward.

Had they been successful, seems like they would also become somebodies for the next 10,000 years

 ;)
« Last Edit: March 09, 2020, 07:55:01 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #358 on: March 09, 2020, 07:53:12 PM »
Or 'Mommy Dearest'

After all, she bathed the little prick until age 11.
What a troll.
'the WC staffers'

At least one staffer stated something to the effect that they were trying like hell to find a conspiracy, adding that it would do wonders got their individual careers going forward.

Had they been successful, seems like they would also become somebodies for the next 10,000 years
 ;)
What a pile! Are you serious? Anyone and everyone that denounced the Warren Report findings were shamed, disgraced, humiliated and/or ruined professionally.
And often referred to as kooks ::)
« Last Edit: March 09, 2020, 07:55:54 PM by Jerry Freeman »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #359 on: March 09, 2020, 07:59:26 PM »
What a troll.What a pile! Are you serious? Anyone and everyone that denounced the Warren Report findings were shamed, disgraced, humiliated and/or ruined professionally.
And often referred to as kooks ::)

The WC was not commissioned to examine claims from Laughing Factories, Funny Farms, Looney Bins, nor from the far shores of the lunatic fringe.

Amen to that, and thanks for once again making my day.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2020, 11:22:32 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #360 on: March 09, 2020, 08:15:05 PM »
The WC was not commissioned to examine claims from Laughing Factories, Funny Farms, Looney Bins, or the far shores of the lunatic fringe.

Amen to that and thanks for once again making my day.

The WC was not commissioned to examine claims from Laughing Factories, Funny Farms, Looney Bins,

You're angry because they ignored you when hey visited the funny farm where you were living....

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #361 on: March 09, 2020, 10:03:11 PM »
The WC was not commissioned to examine claims from Laughing Factories, Funny Farms, Looney Bins,

You're angry because they ignored you when hey visited the funny farm where you were living....
A sign in Nowhere, Special -----showing Chapman's contribution to this forum....


Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #362 on: March 09, 2020, 10:26:39 PM »
I can't understand how the bag being open at one end somehow lends itself to the conclusion that Oswald did not carry the rifle in it.  When the bag was constructed at the TSBD, Oswald would have, by necessity, left one end unsealed in order to put the rifle in it later.  Maybe he discovers there is no tape to seal it in the Paine's garage after putting the rifle in it.  Or maybe he just decides to fold that end down and carry the bag upright.  Most people don't seal their lunch bag shut in fear of the contents spilling out.  It suffices to fold the open end down and then not hold it upside down.  Gravity takes care of the rest.  Maybe he doesn't want to be heard tearing the bag open just before he is getting ready to assassinate the president.  Lots of plausible reasons.  We can't know for sure, but it doesn't seem like a big deal in terms of whether Oswald carried the rifle in the bag. 

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #363 on: March 09, 2020, 11:29:23 PM »
A sign in Nowhere, Special -----showing Chapman's contribution to this forum....



LOL !....  An appropriate road side sign for Chappie.....   That's what he contributes, because that's what he knows about the case.