56 years later and still the WC apologists deny the conspiracy.

[Bill Chapman]

From Love Field through to Croft 120,000+ seconds later there is absolutely no evidence that Kennedy's jacket wasn't bunched but as a last desperate grasp of conspiracy you unrealistically rely on "A lot can happen in 3.33 seconds". Lame, very lame.





Here's the Zapruder film from Croft through to after JFK emerges from behind the sign and all JFK can be seen doing is lifting his right arm and waving.



JohnM

Not so fast, John

A lot can happen in 33.3 seconds
'The Picard Maneuver', for instance:

[Bill Chapman]

You know what’s a lame argument? The idea that “there’s no evidence the jacket wasn’t bunched” is somehow an argument for it actually being bunched at the time he was shot.

It could have been even MORE bunched at the time he was hit.. yes, a lot can happen in those 33.3 seconds

[John Iacoletti]

Not so fast, John

A lot can happen in 33.3 seconds
'The Picard Maneuver', for instance:

Has Chapman ever posted anything relevant?

[John Iacoletti]

It could have been even MORE bunched at the time he was hit.. yes, a lot can happen in those 33.3 seconds

Coulda, woulda, shoulda.

Probably.

[Bill Chapman]

Has Chapman ever posted anything relevant?

Iacoletti Post #87
'A lot can happen in 3.33 seconds'

So he couldn't have straightened out his jacket? How is what I posted not relevant? Aren't you arguing for a possibly not bunched jacket in those remaining 33.3 seconds?

[Bill Chapman]

Coulda, woulda, shoulda.

Probably.

So any possible straightening of his jacket to make it less bunched was not included in your 'a lot can happen is 33.3 seconds' remark?  I would have jumped on that opportunity if I was trying to debunk the bunching thing.

And thanks again for your always-useful input

[John Iacoletti]

So, no evidence that his jacket and shirt were equally bunched at the time of the back shot, but oh look here are some YouTube clips from Star Trek and Terminator movies.