56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.

[Robert Doane]

I was watching for something but didn't catch anything on television on the news, I did see online there is a FOX affiliate from Mobile, AL was having a weeklong series called Gulfcoast connection to the JFK assassination with a story every night.


Paraphrasing Vince Salandria, he wrote that the assassination cover story and its details were transparent or flimsy on purpose with those responsible not worried. Maybe like a bad parent lying to a child with no worries of repercussion.

[Walt Cakebread]

I was watching for something but didn't catch anything on television on the news, I did see online there is a FOX affiliate from Mobile, AL was having a weeklong series called Gulfcoast connection to the JFK assassination with a story every night.


Paraphrasing Vince Salandria, he wrote that the assassination cover story and its details were transparent or flimsy on purpose with those responsible not worried. Maybe like a bad parent lying to a child with no worries of repercussion.

like a bad parent lying to a child with no worries of repercussion.

An apt analogy Mr Doane.....    They knew when they were plotting the coup d e'tat that the majority of Americans had been indoctrinated to worship their ol Unca Sam and they would be very reluctant to believe he was a wolf in sheep's wool........

[Walt Cakebread]

Actually, there's plenty of proof from the autopsy that Oswald could not possibly have acted alone. Witnesses describe Humes probing the back wound and finding no exit. That alone kills the lone nut scenario. Ask the Parkland and Bethesda witnesses where the head wound was. If the shooter from behind hit the president's head, we would see a violent motion forward, right? Instead, all the films show a violent "back and to the left" motion and a wound in the lower right portion of the President's head. That is totally incompatible with a head shot from behind. Sorry lone nutters, but if Oswald was the assassin, all the facts would come together easily. Instead, we have evidence of multiple shooters and trying to force Arlen Specter's boneheaded theory into the history books is an atrocity. The truth is much more complex. The fact that the real killers escaped is hard to accept. But these were professional killers who had a plan and executed it very well.

The fact that the real killers escaped is hard to accept. But these were professional killers who had a plan and executed it very well.

Do you believe the FBI was so inept that they couldn't solve the crime?.... Or is it probable that Hoover's henchmen were the killer's.....

Those "professional killer's" couldn't miss with Hoover and LBJ backing them and feeding lies to the news media......

[John Iacoletti]

people want a narrative and they want a bad guy

. . . whether it’s true or not.

[John Mytton]

. . . whether it’s true or not.

You've had more than half a century to come up with an alternate narrative, how much longer do we have to wait?

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

You've had more than half a century to come up with an alternate narrative, how much longer do we have to wait?

Otherwise, your narrative is just automatically true?

[Jon Banks]

We still can’t prove there was a Conspiracy, nor can it be proven that there wasn’t a Conspiracy...