Back to the movies with Julia Postal

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Back to the movies with Julia Postal  (Read 93965 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Back to the movies with Julia Postal
« Reply #133 on: February 10, 2020, 06:07:06 PM »
Start with the statements on her obviously concocted and convoluted sworn affidavit....
First ..she states that a man ducked into the theater as the police drove by.
Second..Postal said that her boss [John Callahan] jumped into his car and chases the police ???
I have noted in the past that it was never reported that Mr Callahan ever returned to his theater that was invaded by law enforcement authorities from all over Dallas. Does that strike anyone else as odd? At least extremely curious? What ever happened to Mr Callahan?
Third...back to Julia--As she stepped to the curb [by the way not telling Mr Callahan that a man just sneaked into his theater] she "turned around and saw Johnny Brewer" [who she apparently knew] who asked "did she sell that man a ticket" to which she replied "what man?" ::)
Well, by golly---Brewere would go look for him.
How long would it have taken for Brewer [who seemed more concerned about the sneaker-in than anyone else] to have gone in and searched around for this guy and come back out to give a didn't see him report to Postal?
Next..the individual that Postal mused earlier "what man" becomes a likely fugitive she decided :-\
Further...Julia takes charge and has Warren Burroughs [an usher or THE usher?] and Brewer re-enter the theater and do a thorough search this time. How long would this have taken? Brewer returns and reports that "he just wasn't there" :(
Taking absolute command, Postal orders Brewer and Warren to guard the exits...she would call the cops. She calls the police and "some woman answers" but then..disregarding this woman's gender equality, Postal wants to speak to an "officer". Amazing that over the probable hundreds of calls going into the police switchboard at the time she got through anyway. Maybe she had a hotline 8) This time it's definite...her subject is on the run. He ducked in! Why would the officer ask "did he buy a ticket?" Who buys a ticket and then sneaks in? Maybe he vanished after this. No her "woman's intuition" told her he was still there. She "called the projectionist" [I didn't get his name...did anyone?]
Mrs Postal said that she gave the officer a description of this man that she didn't see. She said that "in a minute or two" officers came in-- motorcycle officers...squad car officers...plain clothes officers...carrying rifles and shotguns. Gee that was fast :o
Strange but Julia didn't mention that the cops would show her this guy they nabbed and ask her "is this your guy?"
They had their man...call it cops intuition  ;D
https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338516/m1/1/
https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338516/m1/3/

Thanks for the wealth of information that poses many questions....

 Brewer [who seemed more concerned about the sneaker-in than anyone else] GOOD POINT!..... Why was Brewer so damned obsessed with the sneaker?
We now know that He couldn't have known about the shooting of Tippit at that time.... So what the hell was he so concerned about??

Brewer returns and reports that "he just wasn't there" :(   Taking absolute command, Postal orders Brewer and Warren to guard the exits...she would call the cops.

Really??....   Brewer tells Julie that the man IS NOT IN THE THEATER , But she tells Brewer to block the exits while she calls the police to report a man who Brewer had just told her was NOT IN THE THEATER???  Do you know if Julie smoked the wacky weed?

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Back to the movies with Julia Postal
« Reply #134 on: February 10, 2020, 06:09:11 PM »
Thats not true. And you know its not true.
His old landlady Mary Bledsoe saw him on the bus and said he looked "like a maniac". She did not say that he appeared completely normal.
You can't pick and choose whatever testimony might support your Oswald did it belief. Then what about the --after the bus story ...that Oswald calmly walked up and caught a taxi even offering a woman the cab if she wanted it? Why not address the subject above instead of sundering off into a strawman rabbit hole? 

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Back to the movies with Julia Postal
« Reply #135 on: February 10, 2020, 06:19:15 PM »
You can't pick and choose whatever testimony might support your Oswald did it belief. Then what about the --after the bus story ...that Oswald calmly walked up and caught a taxi even offering a woman the cab if she wanted it? Why not address the subject above instead of sundering off into a strawman rabbit hole?

offering a woman the cab if she wanted it?

I believe this bit of the tale is an invention of the conspirators.   It was invented to lend credence to Whaley's tale.....

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Back to the movies with Julia Postal
« Reply #136 on: February 10, 2020, 10:39:26 PM »
offering a woman the cab if she wanted it?

I believe this bit of the tale is an invention of the conspirators.   It was invented to lend credence to Whaley's tale.....
It could be ...but then why? I don't want to drift off topic. Anyway the testimony seemed so spontaneous-- ---
Quote
Mr. BALL. Let's take the 12:30 trip, tell me about that, what the passenger said.
Mr. WHALEY. He said, "May I have the cab?"
I said, "You sure can. Get in." And instead of opening the back door he opened the front door, which is allowable there, and got in.
Mr. BALL. Got in the front door?
Mr. WHALEY. Yes, sir. The front seat. And about that time an old lady, I think she was an old lady, I don't remember nothing but her sticking her head down past him in the door and said, "Driver, will you call me a cab down here?"
She had seen him get this cab and she wanted one, too, and he opened the door a little bit like he was going to get out and he said, "I will let you have this one," and she says, "No, the driver can call me one."
So, I didn't call one because I knew before I could call one would come around the block and keep it pretty well covered.
Mr. BALL. Is that what you said?
Mr. WHALEY. No, sir; that is not what I said, but that is the reason I didn't call one at the time and I asked him where he wanted to go. And he said, "500 North Beckley."

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Back to the movies with Julia Postal
« Reply #137 on: February 10, 2020, 11:57:38 PM »
It could be ...but then why? I don't want to drift off topic. Anyway the testimony seemed so spontaneous-- ---

I believe that you are misunderstanding.....  I don't doubt that a woman approached Whaley's cab at the bus station.....I'm just sure that Lee Oswald was NOT in that cab....

Lee Could have "admitted" that a lady came up to the cab simply to give himself an alibi that he was in Whaley's cab, which would have covered up the fact that he traveled to the rooming house by some other means.... Like a light green colored Rambler station wagon ......

If Lee said that the lady came up to the taxi....I don't know Lee's motive for "confirming" that incident...but I'm sure he was NOT in Whaley's taxi......


Offline Mike Orr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 401
Re: Back to the movies with Julia Postal
« Reply #138 on: February 11, 2020, 02:29:18 AM »
People who did not follow the game plan would soon find out that they should tell the story that fit the script or they would possibly be lacking enough oxygen to maintain life . Look what they did to those who wanted to buck the system and tell what they actually saw . Domingo Benavides , Dallas Drs. and especially Roger Craig !

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Back to the movies with Julia Postal
« Reply #139 on: February 11, 2020, 04:19:42 AM »
Thanks for the wealth of information that poses many questions....
 Brewer [who seemed more concerned about the sneaker-in than anyone else] GOOD POINT!..... Why was Brewer so damned obsessed with the sneaker? We now know that He couldn't have known about the shooting of Tippit at that time.... So what the hell was he so concerned about?
One thing...Brewer did not submit an affidavit until two weeks after the event.
The cops had practically everybody else submitting affidavits that very day! Yet Brewer had a command position [supposedly] to ID a suspect right then and there at the theater. However, the cops made no attempt to further solicit his information at that time [apparently]
The Commission's chief bulldog [David Belin] seemed just chomping at the bit to interview this 'key' witness.
Quote
Mr. BELIN - I want to take you back to November 22, 1963. This was the day that President Kennedy was assassinated. How did you find out about the assassination, Mr. Brewer?
Mr. BREWER - We were listening to a transistor radio there in the store, just listening to a regular radio program, and they broke in with the bulletin that the President had been shot. And from then, that is all there was. We listened to all of the events.
Mr. BELIN - Did you hear over the radio that the President had died?
Mr. BREWER - I heard a rumor. They said that----one of the Secret Service men said that the President had died, and said that was just a rumor.
Mr. BELIN - Do you remember hearing anything else over the radio concerning anything that happened that afternoon?
Mr. BREWER - Well, they kept reconstructing what had happened and what they had heard, and they talked about it in general. There wasn't too much to talk about. They didn't have all the facts, and just repeated them mostly. And they said a patrolman had been shot in Oak Cliff. 
I don't remember hearing any newscast about 'Secret Service rumors' :-\ Perhaps...but I doubt that anyone connected with the government inquiry reviewed the radio broadcasts concerning the policeman's shooting.
If I somehow fell asleep while listening or had an abundance of wax in my ears I want to know..If someone can locate when & where the announcement-of the patrolman's shooting-& or death- was made-prior to 1:45 please call this to our attention.
From Myer's book on the Tippit shooting: "The exact time that Brewer heard the radio broadcast on the shooting of Office Tippit is not known, although it was very likely broadcast at about 1:31 p.m. over KBOX radio. There were five major radio stations covering the Dallas area - WFAA (570 AM), WPBAP (820 AM), KRLD (1080 AM), KBOX (1480 AM) and KLIF (1190 AM). All of them routinely monitored the Dallas police radio. Again, you wrote that he stated in his affidavit/testimony about listening to KLIF. Where did he say this? I can't find it."
Again ...I did not write that :) Throw straw all over the place but you can't change the facts. The [pretty much] exact time was stated by Brewer---1:30--But that was still even before the announcement of the president's death.
Dale Myers did not have the recordings that we do now.
 You do the math..beginning at the link the time was 1:37 CST [the official announcement of JFK's passing]
At 0:40 there is a suspect in custody [not Oswald] then they report a Dallas [police] Detective DOA at Parkland Hospital [hardly a suggestion of Tippit in Oak Cliff is it?] By 15:00 he apparently became a Secret Service man.
Certainly there was confusion that day and police were swarming all over Jefferson Blvd but not before the announcement of President Kennedy's death.