Those Front Steps

[John Mytton]

The only thing you're smacking around is your reputation, Mr Mytton!

Here, friends, is the Altgens image Mr Mytton has chosen to work with in his latest drive-by GIF:

-snip-

This is now Ford dishonestly presents the evidence, he blows up my version to emphasise the pixels and keeps his version tiny, so it can't a fair comparison. naughty naughty. But this typical of Ford's devious tactics.



Btw the same gap is seen in both, so whatever point you were trying to make, makes no sense.




JohnM

 

[John Iacoletti]

PrayerDude was taking pictures with a camera.  The rest is just parlour games.  But Oswald was busy upstairs killing the president.  So who cares who was standing next to who, or when they were, or what the sun plane was?  Do you realize how rediculous this all is?  I mean, really.....

Well, Mark, it’s because there’s no actual evidence that “Oswald was busy upstairs killing the president”.

[Larry Trotter]

   Ford - To be fair here, You have a blurry image of what appears to be 2 heads. THAT is all the actual physical evidence you have. On the Hosty Notes it is noted that Oswald claimed to have Gone Outside to watch the "P. Parade". There is Nothing on the Hosty Notes pinpointing a location from which Oswald allegedly watched the "P. Parade". Nothing on the Hosty Notes places Oswald on the TSBD Landing or the TSBD Steps. On top of that, NO EYEWITNESS on 11/22/63 has Ever recounted seeing Oswald on the TSBD Landing or the TSBD Steps before, during, or after the assassination. I find the Jet Black Shadow worthy of discussion/investigation. The Oswald element of your position has absolutely No Evidentiary Foundation what-so-ever.

IIRC, the PrayerPersonImage identity only became an issue after, and because of, the claim that said Image represented LeeHarveyOswald.

In any event, LeeHarveyOswald not being on the stairs/top step/landing during the shooting, does not itself place him at the sixth floor so called sniper's nest.

[John Mytton]

Friends, the reason Mr Mytton doesn't want to tell us

-snip-

 

Ffs, you can't be serious, how many times and in how many ways can I answer the same question?
In Wiegman the lady in black is blocking the top half of the railing and by me drawing in the whole railing can in no way move the lady in black.



The railing has been recreated as a solid object in both Wiegman and Darnell as a guide to calculating the distance from the railing to Lovelady and unfortunately for you "lady in black" has no bearing on this equation.
 


JohnM

[John Mytton]

Well, Mark, it’s because there’s no actual evidence that “Oswald was busy upstairs killing the president”.

Wow, you've gone full on Caprio, there is a mountain of actual evidence and whether you choose to believe it or not doesn't change the fact that actual evidence does exist.

JohnM

[Royell Storing]

Ffs, you can't be serious, how many times and in how many ways can I answer the same question?
In Wiegman the lady in black is blocking the top half of the railing and by me drawing in the whole railing can in no way move the lady in black.



The railing has been recreated as a solid object in both Wiegman and Darnell as a guide to calculating the distance from the railing to Lovelady and unfortunately for you "lady in black" has no bearing on this equation.
 


JohnM

     Whether "the lady in black has no bearing" on the equation or not, why not just answer Ford's question? What side of the handrail do You believe she is on? East Side of the Handrail or West Side of the Handrail?

[John Mytton]

     Whether "the lady in black has no bearing" on the equation or not, why not just answer Ford's question? What side of the handrail do You believe she is on? East Side of the Handrail or West Side of the Handrail?

Can you read? I answered the question in the post you responded to.

In Wiegman the lady in black is blocking the top half of the railing and by me drawing in the whole railing can in no way move the lady in black.

JohnM