Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Those Front Steps  (Read 406881 times)

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #371 on: November 19, 2019, 03:33:20 AM »
Suspended for what?

And why ignore my graphic? maybe because it totally screws with your stupid fakery BS!



JohnM
Your graphic? ha ha ha you need serious help. Your family needs to do an intervention, for your own good


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5232
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #372 on: November 19, 2019, 03:45:21 AM »
Your graphic? ha ha ha you need serious help. Your family needs to do an intervention, for your own good

Thanks for the advice, and while I have your attention, here's an updated graphic which puts the final nail in the coffin. These conspiracy nuts who have no experience in the real world should leave this type of advanced graphical analysis to the grown ups, and those pathetic Noobs who can't even post an image to save their lives, really need a new hobby, looking at you Royell. Hahahaha!



JohnM
« Last Edit: November 19, 2019, 03:53:28 AM by John Mytton »

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #373 on: November 19, 2019, 04:12:05 AM »
Thanks for the advice, and while I have your attention, here's an updated graphic which puts the final nail in the coffin. These conspiracy nuts who have no experience in the real world should leave this type of advanced graphical analysis to the grown ups, and those pathetic Noobs who can't even post an image to save their lives, really need a new hobby, looking at you Royell. Hahahaha!

JohnM

"..leave this type of advanced graphical analysis to the grown ups.."  :D

ETA: What you should have done was overlap the 2 images and fade the overlap in and out, if you are going to fade instead of blink. Not sure how applying a fade or morph effect to 2 images is advanced analysis, but you're the expert. Did you write the algorithm or did you just stumble across the Gimp menu option?
« Last Edit: November 19, 2019, 04:35:54 AM by Jack Trojan »

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #374 on: November 19, 2019, 04:21:54 AM »
Thanks for the advice, and while I have your attention, here's an updated graphic which puts the final nail in the coffin. These conspiracy nuts who have no experience in the real world should leave this type of advanced graphical analysis to the grown ups, and those pathetic Noobs who can't even post an image to save their lives, really need a new hobby, looking at you Royell. Hahahaha!



JohnM
John the Expert, "advanced graphical analysis"

Let me guess, next week you'll claim to be a Statistician. Just another hobby, right? ha ha ha  Jonathan Higgins was a fictional character too!

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5232
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #375 on: November 19, 2019, 05:06:06 AM »
"..leave this type of advanced graphical analysis to the grown ups.."  :D

ETA: What you should have done was overlap the 2 images and fade the overlap in and out, if you are going to fade instead of blink. Not sure how applying a fade or morph effect to 2 images is advanced analysis, but you're the expert. Did you write the algorithm or did you just stumble across the Gimp menu option?

Quote
ETA: What you should have done was overlap the 2 images and fade the overlap in and out, if you are going to fade instead of blink.

Yeah, maybe next time I can add flashing lights and furry dice!

Quote
Not sure how applying a fade or morph effect to 2 images is advanced analysis, but you're the expert.

After presenting hundreds of graphics, I receive a lot of uninformed criticism, Yawn, but at the end of the day I'm my own harshest critic and after years in this industry, I learn and therefore I know better than most, it's just a fact.   

Quote
Did you write the algorithm or did you just stumble across the Gimp menu option?

Did I write the algorithm? wtf? what a ridiculously uninformed loaded question, why waste my time doing what graphic programs do for everyone in the business automatically? You try and sound clever but you just keep letting yourself down. I in fact use a number of graphical programs to best get each individual job done, but I digress, this image is an advanced rocket science powered overlay where I have highlighted the important geometry and most importantly highlighted the central railing which is invaluable in positioning Lovelady.



JohnM
« Last Edit: November 19, 2019, 05:12:40 AM by John Mytton »

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5232
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #376 on: November 19, 2019, 05:11:18 AM »
John the Expert, "advanced graphical analysis"

Let me guess, next week you'll claim to be a Statistician. Just another hobby, right? ha ha ha  Jonathan Higgins was a fictional character too!

Quote
John the Expert, "advanced graphical analysis"

Yes, I heard my name and credentials being called, how can I help?

Quote
Let me guess, next week you'll claim to be a Statistician.

At least I don't claim to be an xxxxxxxx.

Quote
Just another hobby, right? ha ha ha

I have plenty of hobbies, is that a problem?

JohnM





Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #377 on: November 19, 2019, 03:34:51 PM »


Seriously that's the best you've got?, we're looking at Lovelady's horizontal position and a little vertical compression and a slight camera change of position is not going to move Lovelady's image halfway across the frame.

Anyway, I found a version with the correct vertical compression and now we see Prayer Person closely aligned, the western column is correctly aligned, the size of the entrance relative to the glass doors behind is correctly aligned and still Lovelady is no where near the centre railing. Sucko!
Just face it, you're way out of your depth and you can go ahead and nitpick some more minor insignificant "details" but that will in no way change the overall mathematically correct geometry, Lovelady is near the shadow EXACTLY where your 3D examples say he should be!



JohnM

Now! Let's start with this, shall we?

Mr Mytton's imagined railing:



The actual railing:



Mr Mytton's gone and put the lady in black on the wrong side of the railing!  :D

F for fail!