The opinions of witnesses

[Walt Cakebread]

Heavily edited though.

What's your point? The WC also edited Day's testimony and discussed the need to edit Oswald's history to make it fit.

Regardless of the editing, you can listen to the witnesses speaking freely.

Your dislike and opinion of Mark Lane doesn't alter that one bit.

you can listen to the witnesses speaking freely.  Your dislike and opinion of Mark Lane doesn't alter that one bit.

Amen...  I found Sam Holland to be particularly compelling and convincing....  The man was clearly troubled by the official tale handed us by LBJ's "Special Select Blue Ribbon Committee of Venerated and Honorable Men" (Like Alan Dulles  )

[Walt Cakebread]

People who viewed the assassination prior to the Warren Report.  These are the opinions I value. Not a lawyers interpretation of their opinion. Thank God for Mark Lane.

Thanks for posting the video, Joe.....  At the 19:20 point in the video the surgeon who worked on Connally is telling reporters what he had observed about Governor
Connally's wounds....and he tracked the BULLET ( he is talking about a complete bullet, or major portion of the bullet)  At 19:34 he says... Quote  ... "It entered the left thigh, where it was spent"...unquote

IOW.....  The bullet that caused the wounds on Connally ended up lodged in Connally's left thigh....   It was NOT merely a piece or particle of the bullet.....

Listen to what the doctor said.....