The "Domino Room Alibi"

[Colin Crow]

What does it matter what I say (e.g., his telling Aline Mosby in Moscow that he'd gotten a "Justice for the Rosenbergs!" pamphlet from an old lady in N.Y.C. when he was a kid, that Nelson Delgado testified that Oswald was reading Das Kapital while in the Marine Corps, that he admitted on TV -- or was it the radio? -- that he was a Marxist, etc, etc) when I know there's a good chance you (or somebody) will say "evil, evil, evil" James Angleton put him up to it, or the evil, evil, evil CIA somehow (Harvey and Lee and the Two Marguerites?) concocted all those things so we could nuke the USSR and/or invade Cuba after the "evil, evil, evil" CIA had killed Kennedy (ironicallu, a charasmatic, anti-communist president who could "sell" anti-communism to the Third World)?

LOL

Short answer -- Because Oswald killed the above-described president in order to bring into power Johnson and hasten "The Dialectic".

--  MWT 

https://100years.upi.com/sta_1963-11-23b.html

I don’t know if he was or wasn’t.....being a bald-faced liar and all......who knows.

FWIW I am not a believer in H&L or a large conspiracy of any kind. However, because I am not totally convinced by the evidence presented by the Warren Commission that Oswald acted alone I am bundled, by those that are, into the amorphous and unsophisticated labelling as a CT, whatever that means.

[Thomas Graves]

I don’t know if he was or wasn’t.....being a bald-faced liar and all......who knows.

FWIW I am not a believer in H&L or a large conspiracy of any kind. However, because I am not totally convinced by the evidence presented by the Warren Commission that Oswald acted alone I am bundled, by those that are, into the amorphous and unsophisticated labelling as a CT, whatever that means.

You, or him?

(LOL)

Regardless, why do you always take things so personally, Brian I mean Colin?

--  MWT 

PS  I'm going to bed, now, if that's okay.  I hope you guys knock yourselves out while I'm sleeping...

[Colin Crow]

You, or him?

(LOL)

Regardless, why do you always take things so personally, Brian I mean Colin?

--  MWT 

I think you got my point about Oswald the bald faced liar (according to Lance).

Do you always post claims about others and then fail to address them when repeatedly requested to do so?

Like the one below.....

"You seem to prefer the interpretations which you believe exonerate Oswald ..."

To be honest, until now I have not paid your contributions to the debate much attention.

[Thomas Graves]

I think you got my point about Oswald the bald faced liar (according to Lance).

Do you always post claims about others and then fail to address them when repeatedly requested to do so?

Like the one below.....

"You seem to prefer the interpretations which you believe exonerate Oswald ..."

To be honest, until now I have not paid your contributions to the debate much attention.

Repeatedly?

It would appear that hyperbole is your self-perceived "forte".

[Colin Crow]

Repeatedly?

It would appear that hyperbole is your self-perceived "forte".

I count 3 successive posts by me on this page....

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2187.120.html

Perhaps you could suggest a more appropriate alternative descriptor...

[Thomas Graves]

I count 3 successive posts by me on this page....

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2187.120.html

Perhaps you could suggest a more appropriate alternative descriptor...

How many different questions are there therein that haven't already haven't attempted to answer?

[Thomas Graves]

It doesn’t. I never claimed it did. Lance postulated in an unsupported claim was that it was somehow behind Oswald's mention of Jarman and Norman under interrogation.

Care to explain why you thought to post this?

You seem to prefer the interpretations which you believe exonerate Oswald ...

I prefer interpretations that are supported by corroborated documented evidence. I have supplied such. Didn't see any by Lance. I am sure he appreciates you championing his cause, even if seemingly abandoned by David.

PS How could I claim full credit Tommy? Would you?

Well, Oh Great Communicator, if you want me to speak for Lance, I would have to say that (going from memory here) Oswald was either in the Domino Room until about 12:26, or he wasn't in the Domino Room at all around lunch time, and took a calculated risk in uttering to the authorities, afterwards, that he'd seen "Junior" and another Negro pass through a section of the first floor during lunchtime.

Will that suffice?

--  MWT