Crease in SN box

[Walt Cakebread]

No "attempt" from me to make some "official scenario believable". I'm just showing the physical possibility in one particular 3D model. Let the chips fall where they may.

You, however, seem a bit desperate to disprove anything the WC or HSCA claimed in regards to a gunman being at the SN.

The Z223 shot would not work with the crease. Or (maybe a better term) the gouge.



Always making it seem impossible or requiring some "Got Talent" feat of contortion.

In the scenario, the weight of the rifle would be on "Box A". Pinning the rifle down with the left hand might be more feasible. OK, now you'll claim the scope would be blocked.

May I compare you to H.L. Mencken, Art Buchwald and Harold Weisberg? You're drawn to the absurdity of things. In this topic, the most absurd thing would be that the gouge was caused by the gunman. Look at what's the President today. Life abounds with absurdities and contradictions.

You, however, seem a bit desperate to disprove anything the WC or HSCA claimed in regards to a gunman being at the SN.

Apparently you have forgotten that Howard Brennan said that he saw a man STANDING ( not sitting on a box behind a stack of boxes) and aiming a rifle out of a window.   Brennan's statement is in direct conflict with you're silly drawings.

[Jerry Freeman]

Is that Lego Oswald? 

[Denis Pointing]

Is that Lego Oswald? 

Obviously Jerry Organ's not nearly as skilful as yourself...when can we expect your improved 3D model then?

[Walt Cakebread]

Obviously Jerry Organ's not nearly as skilful as yourself...when can we expect your improved 3D model then?

Brennan said he saw a man STANDING and aiming a hunting rifle out of a sixth floor window.....If the shooter had been SITTING behind the stack of boxes in the SE corner window,  Brennan could not have seen him.  There was no shooter behind that SE corner window.

[John Mytton]

        We continue hearing that the boxes stacked in the sniper's nest were allegedly FULL of books.

Do you ever get anything right?





Mr. BALL. You have seen pictures of the window, haven't you?
Mr. SHELLEY. Oh, yes.
Mr. BALL. With the larger box on the floor and two Rolling Readers on the top?
Mr. SHELLEY. Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL. One Rolling Reader resting in the sill of the window?
Mr. SHELLEY. Yes.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/shelley2.htm

JohnM

[Royell Storing]

Do you ever get anything right?





Mr. BALL. You have seen pictures of the window, haven't you?
Mr. SHELLEY. Oh, yes.
Mr. BALL. With the larger box on the floor and two Rolling Readers on the top?
Mr. SHELLEY. Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL. One Rolling Reader resting in the sill of the window?
Mr. SHELLEY. Yes.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/shelley2.htm

JohnM

     Thanks. If this is what is inside the box leaning on the window sill, it would Not be adequate to brace/steady the box behind it. Again, what was the purpose of the box on the window sill?

[Denis Pointing]

Brennan said he saw a man STANDING and aiming a hunting rifle out of a sixth floor window.....If the shooter had been SITTING behind the stack of boxes in the SE corner window,  Brennan could not have seen him.  There was no shooter behind that SE corner window.

I've no idea why you're directing this post at me. As far as I can remember I've never mentioned Brennan in my life! Walt, try and get this in your thick head, just because the WC said Oswald was sitting down doesn't necessarily make it so..the WR's not my gospel. I really don't give a flying f*** if Oswald was sitting down, standing up or taking a dump whilst firing the shots! And I certainly don't give a rats ass about a bloody crease on a box.