The Monster Plot, by CIA's Very Own KGB Apologist John L. Hart!

[Thomas Graves]

(Another unpaginated-and-grossly-over-enlarged-by-Michael page of pro-KGB / anti-CIA Counterintelligence propaganda by John L. Hart in his so called "Monster Plot" report -- MWT)

 

Here's a truly informative newspaper article about FBI's "Fedora" (Aleksei Kulak) and the boys by Joseph Trento.  It has much of the same information as the long Reader's Digest article I posted, above.

https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP90-00552R000404610022-4.pdf


Cheers!

-- MWT   

[Michael Clark]

(Another unpaginated-and-grossly-over-enlarged-by-Michael page of pro-KGB / anti-CIA Counterintelligence propaganda by John L. Hart in his so called "Monster Plot" report -- MWT)

 


Here's a truly informative newspaper article about FBI's "Fedora" (Aleksei Kulak) and the boys by Joseph Trento.  It has much of the same information as the long Reader's Digest article I posted, above.

.............

Cheers!

-- MWT   

Another post from Thomas that does not say anything about the subject of the thread: John Hart’s, “The Monster Plot”. Perhaps Thomas will get around to it at some point.

In the meantime we can be thankful that the name of this thread is still:

“The Monster Plot, by CIA's Very Own KGB Apologist John L. Hart!”

[Michael Clark]

By the way, my screen shots are sized quite well for reading on a phone. Your welcome Thomas, I know how often you complain about having to work from your little Android.

[Thomas Graves]

Another post from Thomas that does not say anything about the subject of the thread: John Hart’s, “The Monster Plot”. Perhaps Thomas will get around to it at some point.

In the meantime we can be thankful that the name of this thread is still:

“The Monster Plot, by CIA's Very Own KGB Apologist John L. Hart!”

Michael,

Don't you get it?

The post-1959 (i.e., post inauguration of SCD's "Department 14") shenanigans of "Fedora" (Aleksei Kulak) and "Igor" (Igor Kovshuk) and Yuri Nosenko, as described in Trento's and Hurt's articles, above, (and in other writer's articles and books like, for example, Spy Wars by Tennent H. Bagley), constituted the beginning (and very damaging part) of the (ongoing-today, imho) "Monster Plot" that true-defector Anatoliy Golitsyn tried to warn CIA about, starting in late December, 1961.

Not to mention the "shenanigans" of GRU Colonel Dimitri Polyakov, and KGB officer Igor Loginov, and, and, and ...so many, many others not mentioned in these particular articles.

LOL!


Michael, have I posted this article about "Fedora" and the boys yet?

Please forgive me if I have.

https://www.upi.com/Archives/1981/09/03/A-Soviet-KGB-intelligence-agent-who-defected-in-1964/9948368337600/


Cheers!

--  MWT   


PS  Are you ever going to write a letter to former Army Intelligence analyst John Newman and U.C. Berkeley professor Peter Dale Scott, chastising them for having made the really, really big mistake of believing Tennent H. Bagley when he said (in his books and his PDF) that Nosenko was a false defector?

[Michael Clark]

Michael,

Don't you get it? The post-1959 (i.e., post inauguration of SCD's "Department 14") shenanigans of "Fedora" (Aleksei Kulak) and "Igor" (Igor Kovshuk) and Yuri Nosenko, as described in Trento's and Hurt's articles, constitute the beginning (and very damaging part) of the (ongoing today, imho) "Monster Plot" that true-defector Anatoliy Golitsyn tried to warn CIA about. Not to mention the "shenanigans" of GRU Colonel Dimitri Polyakov, and KGB officer Igor Loginov, and, and, and ...so many, many others not mentioned in these particular articles. LOL!
............

Thomas, You should read John Harts’s work, the subject at hand, “The Monster Plot”, along with Richards Heuer’s “Nosenko: Five Paths to Judgement”, a little, ok, a lot more carefully. You could perhaps rest more easily and stop spamming forums like Chicken Little. The Monster Plot is a myth, formed by Bagely and Angleton who were either remarkably stupid or willing pay an enourmously, and I mean gigantonormously, high price to hide something; something as big as the assassination of a sitting American President.

Yet, incompetence and stupidity do not explain what I have highlighted in my screenshots of John Hart’s book, “The Monster Plot”.

Here is another example of willful incompetence, or a complete lack of attention to doing what was, ostensibly, their job, Gathering information. They just were not interested:

[Thomas Graves]

Thomas, You should read John Harts’s work, the subject at hand, “The Monster Plot”, along with Richards Heuer’s “Nosenko: Five Paths to Judgement”, a little, ok, a lot more carefully. You could perhaps rest more easily and stop spamming forums like Chicken Little. The Monster Plot is a myth, formed by Bagely and Angleton who were either remarkably stupid or willing pay an enourmously, and I mean gigantonormously, high price to hide something; something as big as the assassination of a sitting American President.

Yet, incompetence and stupidity do not explain what I have highlighted in my screenshots of John Hart’s book, “The Monster Plot”.

Here is another example of willful incompetence, or a complete lack of sttention to doing what was, ostensibly, their job, Gathering information. They just were not interested:

Michael,

Would you agree that Hart's 186-page report colloquially known as "The Monster Plot" is about the large "plot" that Anatoliy Golitsyn claimed the KGB had started waging against us in 1959 when it's brand new "Department 14" of the Second Chief Directorate (today's FSB) dispatched GRU Colonel Dimitri Polyakov back to the U.N. in New York City so that he could "volunteer" to spy for the CIA and the FBI?  The big "plot" that Golitsyn tried to warn CIA and even the FBI about?

Started, I said. 

In other words, Operation Boomerang (as Bagley refers to the Polyakov thingy in Spy Wars) was just the very first "Department 14" op, and as such constituted just the tip of the iceberg of what was to come later, and what your boy -- gullible, brainwashed (or worse) -- CIA Operations Dude John L. Hart, derisively and ignorantly called "The Monster Plot".

Did he smoke too much opium in Saigon, or something?  Meet a nice gal at a the Queen Bee?


--  MWT   

Do you even read the articles and excerpts I post, Michael?

If not, why not?

Because you consider them "Deep State Fake News"?

[Michael Clark]

Michael,

Would you agree that Hart's 186-page report colloquially known as "The Monster Plot" is about the large "plot" that Anatoliy Golitsyn claimed the KGB had started waging against us in 1959 when it's brand new "Department 14" of the Second Chief Directorate (today's FSB) dispatched GRU Colonel Dimitri Polyakov back to the U.N. in New York City so that he could "volunteer" to spy for the CIA and the FBI?  The big "plot" that Golitsyn tried to warn CIA and even the FBI about? Started, I said.  In other words, Operation Boomerang (as Bagley refers to the Polyakov thingy in Spy Wars) was just the very first "Department 14" op, and as such constituted just the tip of the iceberg of what was to come later, and what your boy, John L. Hart, derisively and ignorantly called "The Monster Plot".
....
Do you even read the articles and excerpts I post, Michael?If not, why not? Because you consider them "Deep State Fake News"?

I don’t read your ridiculous sentences. It’s painful. You also ask the same stupid questions over and over and over and over again. And you ask questions instead of communicating like a normal person. You don’t really think that anyone believes that you are actually a curious person, do you? I really just think it is some kind of self-stimulation habit of yours and I just don’t pay any attention.

I did notice that you characterized the title of Hart’s work as “Colloqiually known as...”
There is nothing colloquial about it. That is the name of the title.