CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?

[John Iacoletti]

You denied calling us 'lemmings'
I caught you out. Remember?

I never called you a lemming.

Oswald: 'My Prince, this Iacoletti guy, who has been instrumental in keeping my dream of being remembered for the next 10,000 years alive, is now promoting himself as your advocate'
Satan: 'Nah, he worships me. Even TAE kicked him out. He just sat there looking grumpy and even wore a Tshirt emblazoned with his own name, for Christ's sake.'
Oswald: [SMIRK]

Why is nothing you claim about any subject accurate?

[John Iacoletti]

'weapon' lol

>>> 'Weaponize'

Get in tune with modern-day lingo FFS

I haven't "weaponized" anything.  Yet another buzzword you don't understand.

[John Iacoletti]

When are you going to get around to showing Oswald did it? You are easily distracted, just cough up the evidence

When his arguments get dismantled he resorts to attacking the dismantler.

[John Iacoletti]

Frustrating isn't it ?     What does it take for you to understand that I am not going to play your little game?

"Richard" spent months accusing me of going back and editing a photo of Oswald's arrest report when the post in question had no "Last Edit:" timestamp showing that it had ever been edited.  He'll do anything to distract from the actual evidence.

[Colin Crow]

I never called you a lemming.

Why is nothing you claim about any subject accurate?

I did.

[Denis Pointing]

I did.

Colin, stop stirring the pot for Christ's sake. Aren't things bad enough between those two. 

[Colin Crow]

Colin, stop stirring the pot for Christ's sake. Aren't things bad enough between those two. 

But I did Denis..... . I assume we are all after the truth.

I also posted this......

Gee Bill, how can every post of yours be better than the next one?

I wonder whether that is as clear to you as it is to most of us. 

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2031.msg57813.html#msg57813