CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?

[Martin Weidmann]

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.pressdemocrat.com/news/2884078-181/oswalds-wife-finds-a-cryptic%3fview=AMP

'By that time in the spring of 1963, Paine said, she'd come to resent that Oswald was physically abusive of Marina and he wanted to control and keep her isolated.'

Amazing….


In her testimony Paine says that Marina never mentioned to her that Lee had struck her and even after her return to Dallas in September 1963 Marina never mentioned any abuse by Lee.

 
So, how could Paine "come to resent that Oswald was physically abusive of Marina" when she had no way of knowing that?

[Colin Crow]

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.pressdemocrat.com/news/2884078-181/oswalds-wife-finds-a-cryptic%3fview=AMP

'By that time in the spring of 1963, Paine said, she'd come to resent that Oswald was physically abusive of Marina and he wanted to control and keep her isolated.'

But the testimony stands. Ruth resented Oswald's controlling Marina......indeed......who was controlling whom?

[John Mytton]

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/bandwagon

Huh?

Your example is chalk and cheese, this isn't an "idea", these people were not imagining anything, they can only give evidence of what they heard.



JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Huh?

Your example is chalk and cheese, this isn't an "idea", these people were not imagining anything, they can only give evidence of what they heard.



JohnM

Are you pleading ignorance or do you truly not understand John's valid point?

[John Mytton]

Are you pleading ignorance or do you truly not understand John's valid point?

Did you read the page that was linked to, they were discussing "ideas" that haven't been experienced, like "Flat Earth" or "Leprechauns" whereas these people actually heard the evidence that we are discussing, what's the connection?

As usual I provide the evidence and you call them liars, when will it ever end?



JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Did you read the page that was linked to, they were discussing "ideas" that haven't been experienced, like "Flat Earth" or "Leprechauns" whereas these people actually heard the evidence that we are discussing, what's the connection?

As usual I provide the evidence and you call them liars, when will it ever end?



JohnM

So it is indeed ignorance…. got it!

I didn't call anybody a liar, but the fallacy is that even if the majority of people say something happened one way, it still does not mean it really happened that way. Ergo; any appeal to a majority opinion doesn't constitute proof of anything.

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

No, the vast majority of the ear-witnesses said they heard 3 shots.

JohnM

A vast majority of people say a lot of things. You are not saying you are influenced by popularity contests? You also have seen the film of many more people running up the grassy knoll or am I confusing that with a film of NO people running up the street to a building that deals with school books or something???