CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?

[Ross Lidell]

[quote author

The paraffin test "alone" would not exonerate Oswald.

The suspect was apprehended an hour and a quarter after the assassination shots were fired. Oswald had an opportunity to wash his face and remove traces of nitrates.


The idea with applying a very "hot  vax" paraffin test was to actually get "under the skin" to find residues "despite" having watched the face ...

Just for the record regardless of legal implications.

Showing "positive" would make him guilty whereas showing "negative" would not exonerate him ...

We agree about the paraffin test being "inconclusive".

[Jorn Frending]

We agree about the paraffin test being "inconclusive".

I'm not qualified to agree or disagree in this particular matter, so I'll agree to disagree 

(I did study the NAA analysis in depth my self but not this matter)

[Richard Smith]

No for your own

It seems a bit stupid to first make a claim and only later check if it's actually true

It still appears to elude you that there could be no change in venue from Texas to another state for a crime that was committed in Texas that violated Texas law (i.e. murder).   You may want to consult a lawyer like Roger Collins about why that is not an option. 

[Charles Collins]

No for your own

It seems a bit stupid to first make a claim and only later check if it's actually true

I clarified that Wade made the claim. It seems really stupid to say that I made it.

[Bill Chapman]

"In court how would you defend Oswald?"

Demand the autopsy materials be allowed in court.

Have the autopsy doctors explain in court their conclusions illustrated by the autopsy photos. (Assuming the autopsy photos of the inside of JFK's right lung, that would have shown the direction and path of the bullet that allegedly went through his neck, and the photo of the inside of the skull, after the brain was removed. that showed the wound near the EOP, were still amongst the autopsy materials.) Those photos are no longer in the archives.

Jerry Ford muddied the waters on the throat wound location that the photo of JFK's right lung could verify.
The Clark Panel moved the entrance wound in JFK's skull 4 inches.
The photo of the inside of the skull would verify it's location.
Jerry Ford's and the Clark Panel actions aligned the wounds with the official LN narrative of LHO shooting from the 6th floor SE corner TSBD.

I would have JBC and his wife testify in front of the jury that he was not hit by the same bullet that hit JFK.

I would have the railroad workers, who were on the triple overpass, who heard shots and saw smoke from the Grassy Knoll, testify.

Brennan would need to explain to a jury why his affidavit from 11/22/63 stated he could identify the person he allegedly saw fire from the

6th floor, yet he was unable to pick LHO from a police line up later that afternoon.

Expert testimony for the defense to counter government experts.

Cross examination of key eye witnesses and LE personal whose 1st day affidavit statements morphed into the official LN narrative.

Where does it say Brennan was 'unable' to identify Oswald
Stop twisting and ignoring Brennan's fear for his family's safety
Nobody changed the position of back/throat entry wound
...etc

So goes the CT Lunatic Fringe Rinse & Repeat Campaign

[Martin Weidmann]

It still appears to elude you that there could be no change in venue from Texas to another state for a crime that was committed in Texas that violated Texas law (i.e. murder).   You may want to consult a lawyer like Roger Collins about why that is not an option.

I clarified that Wade made the claim. It seems really stupid to say that I made it.

It seems to elude you two clowns that my comment had nothing to do with the content of the message and everything with the silly way it was presented.

As to the content itself; anybody who equates a change of venue to an automatic change of jurisdiction doesn't know the first thing about the law.

I'm not going to go into it too much as that would mean risking losing these two "legal scholars" along the way pretty qiuckly, but I will ask them this very simple question;

If the murder of JFK falls under the jurisdiction of the state of Texas, why was Clay Shaw, who was charged as a conspirator in Kennedy's murder, put on trial in New Orleans?

Any answers?

[Gary Craig]

Where does it say Brennan was 'unable' to identify Oswald
Stop twisting and ignoring Brennan's fear for his family's safety
Nobody changed the position of back/throat entry wound
...etc

So goes the CT Lunatic Fringe Rinse & Repeat Campaign

"Where does it say Brennan was 'unable' to identify Oswald"