JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
How Good Are People at Counting?
Andrew Mason:
--- Quote from: Jerry Organ on February 12, 2018, 11:58:50 PM ---You don't mean midway to the next building along Houston? We'll be getting into the Z250s for the first shot. Gee, you working on another screwball pet theory?
--- End quote ---
My "pet theory" is that the 22 witnesses who said that JFK acted as if he was hit by the first shot were not all experiencing simultaneous halucinations; that Hughes and Betzner were not halucinating when they said they exposed their film before the first shot; that 45 witnesses, including Jackson, were not halucinating when they recalled the 1......2...3 shot pattern; that dozens of witnesses in motorcade and along Elm were not having simultaneous halucinations as to where JFK was at the time of the first shot. That's my "pet theory".
--- Quote ---Jackson also remarks that the first shot occurred just after he tossed the film. That takes us back to his testimony about laughing at the wind taking the film. Dillard spoke about the reverberation being really bad there because of the tall buildings.
--- End quote ---
So how does laughing at the corner affect his ability to hear the shots? He said he was looking forward and just had to look up to the the rifle in the 6th floor window just after the third shot. What is your "pet theory" as to how the incident at the corner prevented him from hearing the shot pattern that he still recalled 36 years later? Does your "pet theory" have any evidence to support it?
On the reverberation point, reverb is not echo. Reverb does not provide two distinct shot sounds. Besides, if people were confused by echos they would have reported MORE than 3 shots.
--- Quote ---That's the problem. What makes you think your 20 cherry-picks had clear comprehension of the shot spanning in the midst of major distraction and confusion, and equally clear reconstruction in their memory?
--- End quote ---
How are you using the term "cherry picking"? If I was selectively choosing the witnesses who observed JFK's reactions to the first shot, please identify the witnesses who said otherwise. I am citing ALL those witnesses. If you disagree, then tell me who I am not including in my list of 22 witnesses who observed JFK immediately after the first shot that you think I should be including (besides Mary Woodward). I did not include Mary Woodward for two reasons: 1. she said things were a little hazy after the first shot but she did not think anyone was hit by it and 2. the second shot was followed rapidly by a third. 2 is inconsistent with 1. Since JFK is reacting to his neck wound 5 seconds before the last shot, if he had been hit on the only on the second shot, the last two shots could not have followed "rapidly".
Bill Brown:
--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on February 14, 2018, 10:25:06 PM ---By the way, it was also mentioned in the Dallas Morning News that earlier as Brewer and Burroughs "passed the back section of the middle aisle downstairs, they heard a seat snap or crack" (November 23, 1963), so according to that, those theater seats did make snapping noises.
--- End quote ---
Irrelevant, unless you can cite that article stating that Brewer or Burroughs said that the "seat snap or crack" sounded like the hammer or the trigger of a revolver.
John Iacoletti:
--- Quote from: Bill Brown on February 16, 2018, 08:08:48 PM ---Irrelevant, unless you can cite that article stating that Brewer or Burroughs said that the "seat snap or crack" sounded like the hammer or the trigger of a revolver.
--- End quote ---
You couldn't possibly get more subjective than that. Some witnesses heard a click or a snap. Other things were known to have caused clicks or snaps. Ergo, some witnesses hearing a a click or a snap (regardless of what they thought it sounded like) actually proves nothing.
Bill Brown:
--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on February 16, 2018, 09:17:03 PM ---You couldn't possibly get more subjective than that. Some witnesses heard a click or a snap. Other things were known to have caused clicks or snaps. Ergo, some witnesses hearing a a click or a snap (regardless of what they thought it sounded like) actually proves nothing.
--- End quote ---
Riiiiiight.
The click or snap of a revolver sounds the same as a theater seat's "click" or "snap".
LOL
Bill Chapman:
--- Quote from: John Iacoletti on February 16, 2018, 09:17:03 PM ---You couldn't possibly get more subjective than that. Some witnesses heard a click or a snap. Other things were known to have caused clicks or snaps. Ergo, some witnesses hearing a a click or a snap (regardless of what they thought it sounded like) actually proves nothing.
--- End quote ---
Did anyone report hearing a thump along with a click or snap? You know, the sound that occurs when the seat hits its back.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version