CBS News Inquiry 1967 - Warren Report (Dan Rather carries a rifle package)

[Martin Weidmann]

What 'something' are you referring to, exactly? That Buell might have indeed decided to not take the chance of frying along with Dirty Harvey, or at least possibly facing a lifetime of genpop suspicion?

(@Newbies: Buell himself stated as much about the latter possible 'genpop' thing. He did in fact suffer somewhat for him being the guy who drove the eventual prime suspect to the eventual scene of the crime. And it's not beyond the realm of possibility that Buell's sister would be somewhat reluctant to be known as the sister of the guy who drove the eventual prime suspect to the eventual scene of the crime.

Tell us what's 'wacky' about self-preservation.

What 'something' are you referring to, exactly?

Your so-called "overarching alternative"

(@Newbies: Buell himself stated as much about the latter possible 'genpop' thing.

@ Newbies: No he didn't state that.

Tell us what's 'wacky' about self-preservation.

I never said self-preservation is 'wacky', so your question is invalid and irrelevant

[Martin Weidmann]

(@Martin)

Yawn, again with the 20 questions and even though every LNer answer I see here is practical and possible you just want to poo-poo everything and then ask the same 20 questions all over again ad nauseum, I don't know if you're insane or I'm more insane because I stick around?
>>> Your lengthy absence led me to believe you were either ill, or had finally had enough of these lunatics. In any case, at least one CTard took credit for your absence.

Well the only place the rifle could be exposed when in a folded bag would be when the rifle was laying down on the back seat and unless Frazier drove like a maniac then the chances of exposure with the most open solution is fairly small.
>>> Close. Buell wasn't driving like a maniac, he was driving a maniac.

I don't really want to know what goes on in your head, but you seem extremely confused

[Colin Crow]

Yawn, again with the 20 questions and even though every LNer answer I see here is practical and possible you just want to poo-poo everything and then ask the same 20 questions all over again ad nauseum, I don't know if you're insane or I'm more insane because I stick around?

JohnM

Actually just 4 questions John, and only 3 relating to the evidence. If I've told you once I've told you a million times it doesn't help to exaggerate!

Jack Nessan is supporting the 42" sack, maybe you missed his contribution. Or is that claim not worth a response from you?

As for your sanity John......are you doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result?

[Matthew Finch]

How many people (in the history of the world) have ever carried their lunch under their arm... between a cupped hand and armpit??

...And in a 2 foot long bag.   

[John Iacoletti]

How many people (in the history of the world) have ever carried their lunch under their arm... between a cupped hand and armpit??

...And in a 2 foot long bag.   

Is this supposed to somehow demonstrate that there was a rifle in that bag?

[Bill Chapman]

...And in a 2 foot long bag.   


Is this supposed to somehow demonstrate that there was a rifle in that bag?

Pretty sure Oswald didn't try to demonstrate that there was a rifle in that bag.

[John Iacoletti]

Pretty sure Oswald didn't try to demonstrate that there was a rifle in that bag.