Your Theories Won?t Do It

[Rob Caprio]

You?re like a broken record with that citations gibberish. I once cited a bibliography and you said I didn?t cite once source. You don?t even read posts and copy your entire shtick from CT books ? Presumed Guilty, was it?

If you?d read that post you?d understand I wasn?t citing evidence, I was listing conclusions, hence why that?s what?s there. You?d also have noticed my challenge at the bottom.

Of course LNers like you hate being asked for supporting citations because you don't have any! You have never provided a supporting cite for your claims. Never. All you present is your biased psycho-babble opinion.

This is classic LNer behavior. No person who appeals to science like you have over the years could be so inept at providing supporting citations as you have been. The evidence in this case does NOT support the claims in the WCR. Any honest person can see this. What evidence converted you to supposedly becoming a LNer (of course you were always one)?

You won't cite it as no supposed convert ever does.

[Dillon Rankine]

Of course LNers like you hate being asked for supporting citations because you don't have any! You have never provided a supporting cite for your claims. Never. All you present is your biased psycho-babble opinion.

This is classic LNer behavior. No person who appeals to science like you have over the years could be so inept at providing supporting citations as you have been. The evidence in this case does NOT support the claims in the WCR. Any honest person can see this. What evidence converted you to supposedly becoming a LNer (of course you were always one)?

You won't cite it as no supposed convert ever does.

😂😂😂😂 Just found an old gem: one of my old posts which had a bibliography of sources contains the phrase ?Rob Caprio will likely claim these citations don?t exist: guess who showed in the comments, totally oblivious to that part because he hasn?t even read the post?

BTW, here?s posts I?ve made since the forum got restarted which contain sources and a bibliography:

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,1120.msg25836.html#msg25836

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,1123.msg26169.html#msg26169

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,1167.msg26905.html#msg26905

My posts usually focus on the science of the case. That?s where I make my citations. My comments are usually shorter and not meant to be in depth. Recently, I?ve done some ?philosophical?/abstract or reflective posts which I suppose you take to be ?psycho-babble opinions.?

My increasing knowledge of the actual evidence turned me from a die-hard CT to LNer. One example: Understanding ballistics and how knowing the velocity and other properties of the carcano bullets, with the range and supposed feat of 399, the equations and experiments show that a bullet could have looked like 399. 

[John Iacoletti]

My posts usually focus on the science of the case. That?s where I make my citations. My comments are usually shorter and not meant to be in depth. Recently, I?ve done some ?philosophical?/abstract or reflective posts which I suppose you take to be ?psycho-babble opinions.?

I think Rob means citations for evidence that converted you to being an ODIA-er.

[Tom Scully]

Inject points to ponder, rinse, repeat...

From Crossfire by Jim Marrs (details easily verified from other sources, consolidated for brevity)


1958:


(Mary Bledsoe's aunt, America Webb, was the widow of Joe Webb, of the same Webb family
of Tennessee and Ennis, TX, as Clarice Marie Webb Campbell, wife of O.V. Campbell.)

Isn't this the marriage of Mary Bledsoe's youngest uncle?


Isn't this 1930 census entry proof RD Matthews and his mother were living with her sister,
Adelaide Germany and her son with Mary Bledsoe's uncle, Jewell Ralston Germany?

[Rob Caprio]

😂😂😂😂 Just found an old gem: one of my old posts which had a bibliography of sources contains the phrase ?Rob Caprio will likely claim these citations don?t exist: guess who showed in the comments, totally oblivious to that part because he hasn?t even read the post?

BTW, here?s posts I?ve made since the forum got restarted which contain sources and a bibliography:

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,1120.msg25836.html#msg25836

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,1123.msg26169.html#msg26169

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,1167.msg26905.html#msg26905

My posts usually focus on the science of the case. That?s where I make my citations. My comments are usually shorter and not meant to be in depth. Recently, I?ve done some ?philosophical?/abstract or reflective posts which I suppose you take to be ?psycho-babble opinions.?

My increasing knowledge of the actual evidence turned me from a die-hard CT to LNer. One example: Understanding ballistics and how knowing the velocity and other properties of the carcano bullets, with the range and supposed feat of 399, the equations and experiments show that a bullet could have looked like 399.

😂😃😃

This LNer, and he was always a LNer, claims the official evidence converted him! This is "comedy gold" to quote Richard Smith and David Von Pein. The study of the official evidence makes anyone who is honest realize a conspiracy took place, but Rankine says it made him realize that LHO acted alone. Sure.

He is so sure of it that he ignored my request for him to cite what evidence made him see the light. They always do this because none exists.

[Rob Caprio]

I think Rob means citations for evidence that converted you to being an ODIA-er.

That is what I meant John and I'm sure he knows it, but what could he cite?

[Paul May]

Please. You were always a LNer. Your avoidance of the actual evidence proves this.

You have NO clue about the actual evidence.  None. You gleam from conspiracy literature like the parrot you are you spew it out when called upon. Let?s you and I debate for the forum?s education. Any area of the event. You game or a coward?