The preponderance of the evidence

[Bill Chapman]

Not only is it a propaganda site, but the article itself is laughable.  It basically amounts to this:

"I believe that Oswald bought a revolver from Seaport Traders, therefore it was a lie when he said he bought one in Fort Worth."

"I believe that he wrote "O.H. Lee" on the so-called "register", therefore he lied about his name"

"He wrote his "diary" after the events described, so he was a liar" (even though he never claimed when he wrote the diary entries)

"I think he had a difficult childhood with his mother which he didn't tell Marina about, therefore he was a liar"

"Oswald told Bouhe he was 'doing fine', and I don't think he was really doing fine, therefore he was a liar"

"Oswald used people as references without their knowledge, so he was a liar"  (even though that's not even a lie)

"He called himself a "Radio Speaker and Lecturer", "Street Agitator", and "Organizer", and I don't think that what he did qualifies as that, therefore he was a liar"

Why is it that LN-ers always pad their arguments with nonsense?

I believe that Oswald bought a revolver from Seaport Traders, therefore it was a lie when he said he bought one in Fort Worth."

You're CT-IOWing again.

Omitting information that affects outcomes is tantamount to lying.

And tell us where in Fort Worth Dirty Harvey bought a revolver.
Omitting that information strips investigators of the opportunity-to-confirm.

[Bill Chapman]

No. Just the Warren Commission report, Reclaiming History and Case Closed, are there.  Maybe you should try reading a CT book Charles. Oh wait, I don't think there is one with just pictures in it.

Yeah, The CT Book of NoName Shooters & Conspirators.

Cut to the chase: Tell us which CT book names the names.
Dude, walk the walk.

Can't wait for the big reveal.

What, too soon?

[Charles Collins]

Because I am interested in examining evidence and not opinions or theories, be they from the WC or from conspiracy writers.

Where are you finding all the evidence to examine?

[Charles Collins]

No. Just the Warren Commission report, Reclaiming History and Case Closed, are there.  Maybe you should try reading a CT book Charles. Oh wait, I don't think there is one with just pictures in it.

Apparently you didn?t read the first post in this thread very well. I am thinking that it might be about time to consider reading another one. Do you have a recommendation?

[John Iacoletti]

And tell us where in Fort Worth Dirty Harvey bought a revolver.
Omitting that information strips investigators of the opportunity-to-confirm.

Gee, maybe they should have asked him.  Maybe they did ask him.

[Martin Weidmann]

Where are you finding all the evidence to examine?

Why should I answer your questions when you refuse to answer mine?

[Walt Cakebread]

Gee, maybe they should have asked him.  Maybe they did ask him.

Yes....And I wonder if this ties to Ruby's panic when he learned that Lee Oswald had been taken alive at the theater?    I don't recall who Ruby was talking to but he was very concerned about "them finding out about the guns and everything"....    As I recall Ruby said:... "We are all going to prison now,...they're going to find out about the guns and everything"

I wonder if Ruby knew where that S&W revolver came from?....   I wonder if it was one of the throw down guns that he had received through a New Mexico PO box ...