Of course you and your trollmates would think it a lame excuse. After all, both of you busybodies are here to protect the killer of JFK.
Tell us if the poster claimed, or merely suggested that Oswald did or might want 'look like a sniper'.
I personally think it was an interesting take on the possibilities given Oswald's aforementioned BY antics, History diary, wanting to be remembered for the next 10,000 years...
Any hints in there for you, Martini?
Of course you and your trollmates would think it a lame excuse. No. It's utterly amazing that you don't (want to) get such a simple concept.
Any sane rational individual understands that a claim or even a suggestion solely based upon what one individual speculates about what another individual might have thought is complete and utter BS and thus lame excuse.
But perhaps it's hardly a surprise that you don't get that after all, as LN's desperately need that kind of speculation to support their fairytale.
After all, both of you busybodies are here to protect the killer of JFK. Really? Who exactly are those "busybodies" and show us please where they have actually tried to protect anybody?
Btw, could it possibly be true that for you disagreeing with the BS arguments you post somehow equals defending a killer?
I personally think it was an interesting take Of course that's what you personally think, because it lets you speculate and make up stuff as much as you want. It's typical for an average LN. In the real world nobody cares what you think.
Any hints in there for you, Martini?Oh sure, but I'll spare your feelings by mentioning any of it. One must have pity for a guy who can't even write my name correctly....