Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 65 66 [67] 68 69 ... 75

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A straight line  (Read 369819 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: A straight line
« Reply #462 on: March 27, 2018, 06:06:57 PM »
Quote from: Tim Nickerson on March 27, 2018, 02:17:35 AM
Why would the bullet only have penetrated an inch or two and what happened to that bullet?

Oh, I don't know.  Maybe it worked its way out via external cardiac massage?

What happened to the bullet from the "first missed shot" that you believe happened?
Logged

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2108
Re: A straight line
« Reply #463 on: March 27, 2018, 06:07:14 PM »
Quote from: John Iacoletti on March 27, 2018, 05:55:15 PM
And there you have it.  You start with the conclusion that they were wounded by a single bullet fired from the SE 6th floor window of the TSBD and you move the bodies around until the wounds (or where you assume the wounds were) sort of line up.

Another claim made without any evidence.  You don't think a human body can move significantly in 2 seconds?

You jumped in here and commented on something without understanding what that something was about. You do that a lot. I was challenged to show that the SBT was possible. I can do that and will do so using numbers and ranges provided by analyses like the ITEK one. 6.4" +/- 2.2" allows me to position Connally as much as 8.6 inches inboard of Kennedy. I don't really need to but it's there.
« Last Edit: March 27, 2018, 06:09:09 PM by Tim Nickerson »
Logged

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: A straight line
« Reply #464 on: March 27, 2018, 06:08:17 PM »
Quote from: Bill Chapman on March 27, 2018, 06:11:22 AM
Show me where I ever claimed I could prove my conclusions to anyone else? And tell us why I would want to in the first place?

Then how did you come to your conclusions?
Logged

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2108
Re: A straight line
« Reply #465 on: March 27, 2018, 06:08:38 PM »
Quote from: John Iacoletti on March 27, 2018, 06:06:57 PM
Oh, I don't know.  Maybe it worked its way out via external cardiac massage?

Extremely improbable.

Quote
What happened to the bullet from the "first missed shot" that you believe happened?

It's missing.
Logged

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: A straight line
« Reply #466 on: March 27, 2018, 06:12:22 PM »
Quote from: Tim Nickerson on March 27, 2018, 06:08:38 PM
Extremely improbable.

It's missing.

It never existed.....  The back wound was an exit wound.
Logged

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: A straight line
« Reply #467 on: March 27, 2018, 06:13:56 PM »
Quote from: Tim Nickerson on March 27, 2018, 06:08:38 PM
Extremely improbable.

That's easy for you to say.  So's the SBT.  What happened to "I only need to show that it is possible"?

Quote
It's missing.

That clears it up.  Then so is the bullet that penetrated JFK's back an inch or two.
Logged

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2108
Re: A straight line
« Reply #468 on: March 27, 2018, 06:16:22 PM »
Quote from: John Iacoletti on March 27, 2018, 06:13:56 PM
That's easy for you to say.  So's the SBT.  What happened to "I only need to show that it is possible"?

 ???

Quote
That clears it up.  Then so is the bullet that penetrated JFK's back an inch or two.

There never was such a bullet.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 65 66 [67] 68 69 ... 75
« previous next »