A straight line

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A straight line  (Read 337037 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: A straight line
« Reply #182 on: March 02, 2018, 03:49:52 AM »
It sure is easy to make an argument when you just assume that the thing you're trying to prove is true.

Show us where I claim the BY scene is proof of murder
Show us where I have claimed that any single factor on its own is proof of murder

My earlier post:
"However, brandishing a rifle, with pistol on his hip, decked out in all-black getup, clutching commie literature* and posing for the camera might suggest that which you dismiss so easily may be not so far off the mark after all"

Show us where I have ever claimed that I could prove Oswald was the killer

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: A straight line
« Reply #183 on: March 02, 2018, 04:22:39 AM »
The fact that you called it a 'lame excuse' suggests you must know Oswald would not want to 'look like a sniper'

No.

Try to follow along, please, if you can...

The person making the claim could not possibly know what Oswald was thinking, so any claim based on that alone would automatically be a lame excuse.

Get it now?

Are you sure the original poster claimed that he knew what Oswald was thinking?
Are you suggesting that I claimed to know what Oswald was thinking?
Are you sure that I require your help in this matter?

A person can study Oswald's backstory including the BY scene, the 'killer of facsists' note, George DeM joking around about the Walker attempt, Oswald often calling himself important (according to Marina, and which she also found funny).

I contend that adding the scope to the mix could arguably align with Oswald's known arrogant behaviour.
« Last Edit: March 02, 2018, 04:34:05 AM by Bill Chapman »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8183
Re: A straight line
« Reply #184 on: March 02, 2018, 10:24:22 AM »

Iacoletti = 787 posts in less than two months.

Pretty damn busy, John


A classic BS argument, frequently used by LNs as if it matters.

Whenever Mytton gets stuck he often uses the same crap. Did you get the idea from him, perhaps?

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8183
Re: A straight line
« Reply #185 on: March 02, 2018, 10:31:23 AM »
Show us where I claim the BY scene is proof of murder
Show us where I have claimed that any single factor on its own is proof of murder

My earlier post:
"However, brandishing a rifle, with pistol on his hip, decked out in all-black getup, clutching commie literature* and posing for the camera might suggest that which you dismiss so easily may be not so far off the mark after all"

Show us where I have ever claimed that I could prove Oswald was the killer

What's the point of a lame "I don't know for sure but he possibly could have" argument?

It means nothing and does not contribute to the discussion, does it now?



Are you sure the original poster claimed that he knew what Oswald was thinking?
Are you suggesting that I claimed to know what Oswald was thinking?
Are you sure that I require your help in this matter?

A person can study Oswald's backstory including the BY scene, the 'killer of facsists' note, George DeM joking around about the Walker attempt, Oswald often calling himself important (according to Marina, and which she also found funny).

I contend that adding the scope to the mix could arguably align with Oswald's known arrogant behaviour.


Who cares about what somebody speculates Oswald was thinking? No matter how you twist and turn it, any argument (or even suggestion) based on such speculation will always be a lame excuse.

Are you sure that I require your help in this matter?

Well, you sure as hell need help from somebody..... but I would prefer it if it wasn't me as I don't really like to waste my time.


Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: A straight line
« Reply #186 on: March 02, 2018, 10:41:50 AM »
Stop yelling, and take your meds

Emboldening words is not shouting. Putting words in "upper case" is shouting. Please try to keep up, Chappers.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: A straight line
« Reply #187 on: March 02, 2018, 10:34:57 PM »
I am assuming or inferring that. The actual registration documents for that box were destroyed..

Not before the FBI saw them apparently.




Quote
A Hidell was likely registered to receive mail at that box because mail addressed to that name was received at that box.

What mail?  And don't say the rifle, because that would be a circular argument!  However, see the above.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: A straight line
« Reply #188 on: March 02, 2018, 10:39:33 PM »
Oswald denied everything
Marina wasn't in the sniper nest at the time

You sure are a slippery one.  You invoke Marina's amused reaction to the backyard photos to support your notion that Oswald kept the scope on the rifle to look like a sniper when Marina never saw a scope on the rifle. Then you divert back to the sniper's nest, even though you were the one trying to use the backyard photos to make your point.  So much for requiring a scope on a rifle to look like a sniper though.