A straight line

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A straight line  (Read 337045 times)

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: A straight line
« Reply #175 on: March 01, 2018, 08:17:31 PM »
No, I don't. Tell me how difficult it would be.

Damned near impossible. And at the very least, Oswald must have taken the time AFTER the shooting to wipe his prints off the stock, bolt and trigger, before ditching the weapon. You give LHO way too much credit. No one could have done this, let alone patsy Oswald.

Quote
Or to a PO Box registered under "AJ HIDELL". And my name is Andrew, BTW.
Sorry Andrew, but Shirley LHO knew that any rifle found in the building would come back to him. The FBI linked the gun to Oswald in less than 12 hours! Imagine that.

Quote
According to Robert Frazier of the FBI, the scope was slightly out but if the target was moving in the direction away and to the right, the error was reduced. So by aiming at the president's head it would have hit 6 inches lower in the upper back. 3 H 409

Frazier said the scope needed 3 shims for it to even hit the target. That is no where near "slightly out". Face it, the scope was useless, even IF Oswald was a practiced marksman. No one could have used the scope to make 2 of 3 shots, which includes the head shot. And Oswald was NOT a practiced marksman by any stretch, he was a patsy that didn't even take a shot.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: A straight line
« Reply #176 on: March 01, 2018, 10:08:57 PM »
No, I don't. Tell me how difficult it would be.  Or to a PO Box registered under "AJ HIDELL".

What gave you the idea that there was a PO box registered under AJ HIDELL?

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: A straight line
« Reply #177 on: March 02, 2018, 12:59:02 AM »
Damned near impossible. And at the very least, Oswald must have taken the time AFTER the shooting to wipe his prints off the stock, bolt and trigger, before ditching the weapon. You give LHO way too much credit. No one could have done this, let alone patsy Oswald.

You state that as if you know it from experience.  Are you a forensic crime analyst as well? That's quite a resume you've got there.

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
    • SPMLaw
Re: A straight line
« Reply #178 on: March 02, 2018, 01:39:18 AM »
What gave you the idea that there was a PO box registered under AJ HIDELL?
I am assuming or inferring that. The actual registration documents for that box were destroyed.. A Hidell was likely registered to receive mail at that box because mail addressed to that name was received at that box. When Oswald moved to New Orleans he registered A. Hidell as a person entitled to receive mail there.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: A straight line
« Reply #179 on: March 02, 2018, 03:28:15 AM »
It sure is easy to make an argument when you just assume that the thing you're trying to prove is true.

Iacoletti = 787 posts in less than two months.

Pretty damn busy, John


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: A straight line
« Reply #180 on: March 02, 2018, 03:36:21 AM »
Sigh.  No, Bill.  It's a lame excuse because it's completely contrived with no evidence whatsoever that Oswald wanted to "look like a sniper" while shooting the president.  If that was the case, and he had actually done it, why would he deny doing it?

You mean the same Marina who said there was no scope on this rifle at the time?

Oswald denied everything
Marina wasn't in the sniper nest at the time

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: A straight line
« Reply #181 on: March 02, 2018, 03:44:47 AM »
You state that as if you know it from experience.  Are you a forensic crime analyst as well? That's quite a resume you've got there.

Spank you very much. But you don't have to be an expert to use some common sense, logic and maybe a little research. You should try it sometime.