Firearms experts who say; ?I can't do it so it can't be done?, cannot be trusted

[Bill Chapman]

Now we can see you really don't believe anything and this is all a tale to you, more about how subjective you are. You would be great at writing stories for children.

In you, I am writing for a child
 
The assassination was basically a mouse* getting to an elephant**
You lot need elephant-on-elephant, but the reality is that an Oswald can get to anyone
That's what keeps you lot as emotionally stunted, fearful children

*ProbablyOswald
**Definitely Kennedy

[John Iacoletti]

The assassination was basically a mouse* getting to an elephant**

Don?t you mean a gorilla getting to a basketball?

*ProbablyOswald

Probably no reason to think so.

[Bill Chapman]

Don?t you mean a gorilla getting to a basketball?

Probably no reason to think so.

Ruby getting to Oswald (unnoticed) is the gorilla thing. The observers in the basement only had eyes for basketball-headed Oswald

Proportionality bias is the Oswald v JFK thing.
Little Shot v Big Shot.

There, fixed it for you..

[John Iacoletti]

Ruby getting to Oswald (unnoticed) is the gorilla thing. The observers in the basement only had eyes for basketball-headed Oswald

Proportionality bias is the Oswald v JFK thing.
Little Shot v Big Shot.

There, fixed it for you..

Your animal analogies, while amusing, add no enlightenment.

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

In you, I am writing for a child
 
The assassination was basically a mouse* getting to an elephant**
You lot need elephant-on-elephant, but the reality is that an Oswald can get to anyone
That's what keeps you lot as emotionally stunted, fearful children

*ProbablyOswald
**Definitely Kennedy

That was beautiful, are you any relation to that crazy lady on the children's show" Romper Room"?
 When a person like yourself avoids the subject at hand, capitulation is usually right around the corner

[Bill Chapman]

That was beautiful, are you any relation to that crazy lady on the children's show" Romper Room"?
 When a person like yourself avoids the subject at hand, capitulation is usually right around the corner

Seems you're the one still watching kiddie shows

[Joe Elliott]

We wouldn?t necessarily have heard from Carlos Hathcock but we would have heard from someone.

We did. We heard from Craig Roberts.

Let me rephrase that. We would have heard from multiple people. And some of those people would have been Marines who were known associates Carlos Hathcock. Hathcock trying to find a Marine who could hit a human size target, moving at speeds of 8 to 13 mph, all at under 100 yards, would have been known by many people.

It staggers belief that no Marine and known associate of Hathcock would speak of these tests.

It also staggers belief that no Marine could be found who could hit such a target 2 out of 3 times. Particularly since Michael Yardley was able to do so 16 out of 16 times.