YouTube no longer recommending conspiracy videos

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: YouTube no longer recommending conspiracy videos  (Read 38416 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: YouTube no longer recommending conspiracy videos
« Reply #14 on: February 11, 2019, 10:08:27 PM »
« Last Edit: February 11, 2019, 10:10:30 PM by Bill Chapman »


Offline Paul May

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 908
Re: YouTube no longer recommending conspiracy videos
« Reply #16 on: February 11, 2019, 10:19:30 PM »
WTF? Surely, you can't be serious?

Walt is right though. YouTube is not violating anyone's constitutional rights with this.

Very accurate. Videos are still there.  Just won?t be promoted.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5010
Re: YouTube no longer recommending conspiracy videos
« Reply #17 on: February 11, 2019, 10:28:51 PM »
Very accurate. Videos are still there.  Just won?t be promoted.

     This is ALL about Controlling the flow of communication/information. All directed at influencing the 2020 Pres. Election.

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: YouTube no longer recommending conspiracy videos
« Reply #18 on: February 11, 2019, 10:48:51 PM »
What Google is responding to is the Fake News business used in cyber warfare, primarily by the rooskies as a propaganda campaign to get Trump elected. The rooskies specifically targeted the Blue Wall States needed to win the electoral college and the election.

The rooskies may have tipped the scales in Trump's favor but what put him over the top was GOP voter suppression tactics along the Blue Wall. Trump won those 4 States by less than 50,000 votes, however, there were over a million disenfranchised voters, primarily of color whose names got onto a voter list as part of the GOP "Crosscheck" program. This was a list of duplicate names that they could disenfranchise at their discretion to ensure the same person did not vote twice, especially if they were Democrats. The GOP's shtick being that duplicate names targets more black people than whites and most blacks are Democrats. Besides, the GOP could wade thru the list any way they wanted and skip all the white duplicate GOP voters.

Match this up with gerrymandered districts and the GOP knew which duplicates to keep and which were likely stinking Democrats, that they could disenfranchise. They could even phone them up and ask which party they were affiliated with. Among the millions of voters suppressed along the Blue Wall, how many Democrats were among them? More than 50,000 or 5%? More likely 800,000 or 80% Democrats comprised that list. And how much did the rooskies effect the vote? Enough, apparently for Trump to be Putin's puppet. This voter suppression/rooskie double bill was obviously extremely effective. Worked for Trumputin.

If you want to understand the cyber-tactics of the rooskies, then look into Cambridge Analytica. Under Bannon's direction they used the Facebook data to profile users to define Trump's policies and the rooskie propaganda campaign.

I'm sure Google would ban my post since I am obviously a Fake News CT. And don't get me started on 9/11!
« Last Edit: February 12, 2019, 12:18:41 AM by Jack Trojan »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5010
Re: YouTube no longer recommending conspiracy videos
« Reply #19 on: February 11, 2019, 10:56:38 PM »
What Google is responding to is the Fake News business used in cyber warfare, primarily by the rooskies as a propaganda campaign to get Trump elected. The rooskies specifically targeted the Blue Wall States needed to win the electoral college and the election.

The rooskies may have tipped the scales in Trump's favor but what put him over the top was GOP voter suppression tactics along the Blue Wall. Trump won those 4 States by less than 50,000 votes, however, there were over a million disenfranchised voters, primarily of color whose names got onto a voter list as part of the GOP "Crosscheck" program. This was a list of duplicate names that they could disenfranchise at their discretion to ensure the same person didn't not vote twice, especially if they were Democrats. The GOP's shtick being that duplicate names targets more black people than whites and most blacks are Democrats. Besides, the GOP could wade thru the list any way they wanted and skip all the white duplicate GOP voters.

Match this up with gerrymandered districts and the GOP knew which duplicates to keep and which were likely stinking Democrats, which they could disenfranchise. They could even phone them up and ask which party they were affiliated with. Out of the million voters suppressed from voting along the Blue Wall, how many Democrats were among them? More than 50,000 or 5%? More likely 800,000 or 80% Democrats comprised that list. And how much did the rooskies effect the vote? Enough, apparently for Trump to be Putin's puppet. This voter suppression/rooskie double bill was obviously extremely effective. Worked for Trumputin.

If you want to understand the cyber-tactics of the rooskies, then look into Cambridge Analytica. Under Bannon's direction they used the Facebook data to profile users to define Trump's policies and the rooskie propaganda campaign.

I'm sure Google would ban this post since I am obviously a Fake News CT. And don't get me started on 9/11!

                Trump won the Blue Wall States because Hillary/Dems took them for granted and they Failed to campaign there. The "Rooskies" stuff and "voter suppression" is just an excuse for their having ignored those states. Pure & Simple Dem. ARROGANCE.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: YouTube no longer recommending conspiracy videos
« Reply #20 on: February 11, 2019, 10:56:58 PM »
You give entirely to much credit to stupid people. Example:  motorcycle helmet laws. Some states have them, some don?t. Studies show, helmets save lives. I rode a bike for some 30 years.  Would never ride without one.  Stupid people still do.  Same people seeking medical advice on YouTube.  Once again, anti-intellectual.

 motorcycle helmet laws. Some states have them, some don?t. Studies show, helmets save lives.

I also have been a rider for a half century...  I wear a helmet.   But It's not the governments place to force a rider to wear a helmet....But insurance companies have the money to control lawmakers....   Thus misguided politicians with their hands out create the laws. 

Most states also have seat belt laws  .... I'd hasten to point out that someone riding in a car without his seat belt is much safer than a person riding a motorcycle with a helmet.... 

It's not the governments place to censor YouTube videos.....