JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
So when does Oswald's own actions end and the framing of a patsy begins?
Michael O'Brian:
--- Quote from: Jerry Organ on February 01, 2018, 04:35:20 PM ---The Tommy Thompson article was submitted before Oswald was terminated with extreme prejudice. Thompson was back in Los Angeles when that happened.
To accommodate the information that Oswald had died, the article text (and I would assume particularly the end portion) was edited. Because of time limitations, it's possible Thompson wasn't involved in the revision.
The original Thompson article was published in a small number of Life issues. I believe it was titled "Assassin: The Man Held for Kennedy's Murder". The banner was then changed and the Jack Beers photo added, along with the story updates.
--- End quote ---
Thanks for that info!!! So the interview must have taken place on Friday evening or during Saturday 23.11.63 Very interesting how her version of events regarding her last meeting with her Husband changed
Larry Baldwin:
--- Quote from: Jerry Organ on February 01, 2018, 02:44:05 AM ---This beaut would slot nicely with Fratini's paper bag theory.
--- End quote ---
Why don't you pull your head out of the sand, go back to Fratini's "Paper Bag theory" thread, and answer the questions left for you.
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,159.70.html
Larry Baldwin:
--- Quote from: Jerry Organ on February 01, 2018, 05:54:17 PM ---So how much of this topic's theory (that Oswald didn't go to Irving on Nov 21) do you, apparently a Fratini supporter, believe?
--- End quote ---
I am not sure why you would assume that I believe any of it (or that I am a Fratini supporter). I happened to like Fratini's post and noticed that you failed to engage in what I can only assume you believed to be a losing battle.
Incidentally, I haven't read the interview but, if Marina was interviewed a week after the shots and says the last time she saw Lee was the previous Thursday, then she is probably referring to the night before the shots.
Dan DAlimonte:
--- Quote from: Larry Baldwin on February 01, 2018, 07:41:11 PM ---I am not sure why you would assume that I believe any of it (or that I am a Fratini supporter). I happened to like Fratini's post and noticed that you failed to engage in what I can only assume you believed to be a losing battle.
Incidentally, I haven't read the interview but, if Marina was interviewed a week after the shots and says the last time she saw Lee was the previous Thursday, then she is probably referring to the night before the shots.
--- End quote ---
Hey, Larry. The interview with Life took place when Oswald was still alive.
So in essence, Oswald did not go home that Thursday and therefore couldn't have
smuggled in a rifle on Friday morning. This means that any witness who testified
that he did go home was coerced to lie about it. Which is easier to believe - she
left out that Thursday visit or that happier visit - the weekend before last - was indeed the
last time she saw her husband.
Of course, if he didn't go home ... this means the planners of his patsy hood had
Oswald already implicated whether he came from Irving or from his rooming house.
So why coerce people who could eventually tell the truth about the matter when they could
have said - it was his rifle so he must have somehow smuggled it in before the President came.
Btw .. if it was that easy to coerce his wife and co-worker what would have prevented them
from coercing a bus driver or a passenger or a stranger had he left his rooming house and state
... Come to think of it. I did see him carrying a package when he entered the bus.
Richard Smith:
--- Quote from: Dan DAlimonte on February 01, 2018, 03:24:17 AM ---Do you think both Marina and Buell are scared to death now?
Since they both must be in their 70's and they'll be forever linked to this case
anyway why not go on TV and come clean with what happened esp if it's different
from the official narrative? I was afraid they would deport me. I was afraid they'd kill me.
The public would understand.
--- End quote ---
Good point. Both Marina and Frazier have freely expressed doubts about Oswald's guilt. But we must believe they are still too scared to set the record straight by confirming that Oswald didn't go to Irving on Thursday. LOL I thought I had heard it all by now from CTers but that one is a real whopper. Conspiracy theory in this case is, at its core, a child-like faith that anyone who provides evidence of Oswald's guilt is suspect and a liar. Even if these same people are relied upon in other instances to support his innocence. Like Frazier and his two-foot long bag. Imagine the plan behind that one in this context. They get Frazier to lie about Oswald going to Irving and carrying a long bag to frame Oswald but then he won't confirm that the bag (which would not have existed at all if Oswald didn't actually make that trip) was long enough to carry the rifle. The entire intent of this fabrication. That is fall on the ground laughing material.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version