Dear Mr Hunt...

[Walt Cakebread]

Dear Walter,

Then why the fuzziness the handwriting expert wrote about in his report that he said made it impossible for him to determine with100% certainty whether or not the note was bona fide or bogus?

IIRC, he said it looked to him as though "the note" was a blown up image of a microfilm image that itself was out of focus.

-- Mudd Wrassler Tommy 

Perhaps Mr McNally was looking at something different than what I've seen.....  The "Dear Mr Hunt Note that i've seen appears to have been taken with a camera....Not a photocopy  machine.   The photo that I've seen isn't "blurry".....   And I'm convinced that it was in fact written by Lee Oswald....

[Thomas Graves]

Perhaps Mr McNally was looking at something different than what I've seen.....  The "Dear Mr Hunt Note that i've seen appears to have been taken with a camera....Not a photocopy  machine.   The photo that I've seen isn't "blurry".....   And I'm convinced that it was in fact written by Lee Oswald....

Dear Walter,

How many "Dear Mr. Hunt" notes do you figure Oswald wrote?

-- Mudd Wrassler Tommy 

[Walt Cakebread]

Dear Walter,

How many "Dear Mr. Hunt" notes do you figure Oswald wrote?

-- Mudd Wrassler Tommy 

Oh you're real cute.....Tommy Mudd Wrassler.....  But you're not as clever as you perceive yourself to be.....

[Thomas Graves]

Dear Walter,

EDIT # 1:

Handwriting expert McNally said that the poor-quality photocopy Penn Jones received from a mysterious source in Mexico City (Nikolai Leonov?) looked as though it was a blown up photocopy of a microfilm image which itself was out of focus.

Which suggests that the mysterious sender wanted the note to be fuzzy so that it couldn't be analyzed with any certainty.

Care to comment?

-- Mudd Wrassler Tommy 

EDIT # 2:

In your first post, this thread, you wrote:

Whitington presented a photo of the note 
in the book that is a bit different than other copies of the note that I've seen...which leads me to believe that Curington presented a photocopy of the note to Mitchel.

Dear Walter,

Would you please specify what these differences are?

Thank you.

-- Mudd Wrassler Tommy 

[Walt Cakebread]

Dear Walter,

[Edit in progress ...]

-- Mudd Wrassler Tommy 

Do you think the HSCA gave McNally the same note that's photo-reproduced in this wonderful new book you're talking about, and that said note, when it was in his hands and under his magnifying glass, was too fuzzy for him to conclusively analyze, but in your book is crystal clear?

Or do you think they were different notes altogether?

The question is utterly stupid, and does not warrant an answer......

Do you think the HSCA gave McNally the same note that's photo-reproduced in this wonderful new book


The HSCA gave McNally a reproduction of the Dear Mr Hunt note,...... How would I know what Mc Nally's copy looked like???..... He said it was fuzzy and not a good clear copy ....and therefore he couldn't draw any solid conclusion about the note.   

However, your suggestion that the note was created by Russian spies is utterly ludicrous ....LOL.

[Thomas Graves]

Dear Walter,

EDIT # 1:

Handwriting expert McNally said that the poor-quality photocopy Penn Jones received from a mysterious source in Mexico City (Nikolai Leonov?) twelve years after the assassination and "dated" November 8, 1963, looked as though it was a blown up photocopy of a microfilm image which itself was out of focus.

Which suggests that the mysterious sender wanted the note to be fuzzy so that it couldn't be analyzed with any certainty.

Care to comment?

-- Mudd Wrassler Tommy 

EDIT # 2:

In your first post, this thread, you wrote:

Whitington presented a photo of the note in the book that is a bit different than other copies of the note that I've seen...which leads me to believe that Curington presented a photocopy of the note to Mitchel.

Dear Walter,

Would you please specify what these differences are?

Thank you.

-- Mudd Wrassler Tommy 

Completely rewritten, then edited again, and bumped.

-- Mudd Wrassler Tommy 

[Walt Cakebread]

Dear Walter,

EDIT # 1:

Handwriting expert McNally said that the poor-quality photocopy Penn Jones received from a mysterious source in Mexico City (Nikolai Leonov?) looked as though it was a blown up photocopy of a microfilm image which itself was out of focus.

Which suggests that the mysterious sender wanted the note to be fuzzy so that it couldn't be analyzed with any certainty.

Care to comment?

-- Mudd Wrassler Tommy 

EDIT # 2:

In your first post, this thread, you wrote:

Whitington presented a photo of the note 
in the book that is a bit different than other copies of the note that I've seen...which leads me to believe that Curington presented a photocopy of the note to Mitchel.

Dear Walter,

Would you please specify what these differences are?

Thank you.

-- Mudd Wrassler Tommy 

Would you please specify what these differences are?

No!