Lack Of Damage To CE-399

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Lack Of Damage To CE-399  (Read 221151 times)

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #322 on: April 13, 2020, 08:51:57 PM »
Are you sure the bullet now in evidence as CE399 was ever at Parkland Hospital?

Absolutely not sure. It could have been introduced into evidence at any point in place of whatever was "found" at Parkland. The provenance of CE-399 is as pathetic as all the other evidence that the DPD and FBI mishandled.

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #323 on: April 13, 2020, 08:55:22 PM »
The large mangled pieces of bullet found in the limo came from the head shot on JFK.

Linky to the report that proves this pls. It better include the fragments extracted from JFK's brain and compared with the larger pieces.

Online Gerry Down

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1167
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #324 on: April 14, 2020, 01:25:45 AM »
Linky to the report that proves this pls. It better include the fragments extracted from JFK's brain and compared with the larger pieces.

Its common sense. How else did they get in the limo? They were hardly thrown in.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #325 on: April 14, 2020, 01:33:37 AM »
Its common sense. How else did they get in the limo? They were hardly thrown in.

How do you know the fragments now in evidence came from the limo? More "common sense", perhaps?

Online Gerry Down

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1167
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #326 on: April 14, 2020, 01:34:35 AM »
How do you know the fragments now in evidence came from the limo? More "common sense", perhaps?

It seems like such a big clumsy plot to be planting evidence like those fragments.

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #327 on: April 14, 2020, 02:38:28 AM »
It seems like such a big clumsy plot to be planting evidence like those fragments.

But what if those fragments didn't match the other planted evidence? Those fragments might have been found in the limo but there is no provenance for it or practically any of the evidence in this case. Why did they "clean up" the limo by removing and destroying the windshield with the bullet hole in it? Wouldn't it be insane to tamper with crucial evidence found in the limo? And if they were willing to scrub the limo, then why wouldn't they swap out or manufacture bullet fragments previously shot by the planted rifle? The CIA and FBI weren't amateurs at this stuff.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #328 on: April 14, 2020, 03:57:39 AM »
How do you know the fragments now in evidence came from the limo? More "common sense", perhaps?



Mr. EISENBERG - When did you receive that fragment, Mr. Frazier?
Mr. FRAZIER - At 11:50 p.m., November 22, 1963, from Special Agent Orrin Bartlett, our liaison agent with the Secret Service, in the FBI laboratory.
Mr. EISENBERG - And the last bullet fragment you examined, Exhibit 567, when did you receive that?
Mr. FRAZIER - It was received at the same time from Special Agent Bartlett.
Mr. EISENBERG - Did you examine both at that time, Mr. Frazier?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir; beginning the following morning, November 23.
Mr. EISENBERG - Mr. Chairman, may I have this bullet fragment marked Q-3 admitted as Commission 569?