Lack Of Damage To CE-399

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Lack Of Damage To CE-399  (Read 221226 times)

Online Gerry Down

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1167
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #308 on: April 01, 2020, 02:49:54 AM »


If there was a bullet fragment in Connallys thigh, and CE399 was all in one piece, could the fragment in his thigh have come from a fragment of the JFK head shot?

Would that trajectory work?

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #309 on: April 01, 2020, 04:09:03 AM »
Who prodded Nellie Connally to resist the fragment removal?
Quote
Before former Texas Gov. John Connally was buried Thursday, his family rejected a request from the FBI that bullet fragments be removed from his body in an effort to learn more about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, a government official said. Connally, who was wounded while riding in the presidential limousine in Dallas when Kennedy was killed on Nov. 22, 1963, died Tuesday of lung disease.

On Wednesday, research groups asked Attorney General Janet Reno to seek the removal of bullet fragments thought to be in Connally's wrist and thigh so the pieces could be analyzed.

The government official said a Dallas FBI agent made the request to the family and was turned down. He did not say why. The researchers - longtime critics of the Warren Commission's finding that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in assassinating Kennedy and wounding Connally - say the fragments lodged in Connally's body could prove that more than one assailant fired on the limousine carrying Kennedy and Connally.The researchers argue that tests might show that Kennedy and Connally were hit by different bullets, which could disprove the so-called "single-bullet" theory, which formed the core of the Warren Commission's controversial finding.

https://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-xpm-1993-06-18-9306180244-story.html   

Offline Mike Orr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 401
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #310 on: April 01, 2020, 08:47:25 PM »
Why not go for the bullet in John Connallys thigh ? First of all , there can't be 2 ' CE 399's ' , can there ? What is there to worry about ? The truth hasn't bothered the Warren Commission up to this point , has it ? Just as USMC Carlos Hathcock said , we set up the scenario in Virginia and nobody could make the shots that LHO was to have made , and that includes Hathcock himself , who was one of the best snipers ever ! A fusillade of shots came into the Limo with JFK getting hit in the head 3 times , a frontal throat shot and a shallow shot in the back which makes JFK being hit 5 times himself as per Douglas Horne AARB . Who told Gerald Ford that it was OK to move JFK's Back Shot up to the base of the neck therefore starting the Arlen Specter lie of 'The Single Bullet Theory' ! Ford was J Edgar Hoovers mole IMO .

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #311 on: April 01, 2020, 08:53:03 PM »
Why not go for the bullet in John Connallys thigh ? First of all , there can't be 2 ' CE 399's ' , can there ? What is there to worry about ? The truth hasn't bothered the Warren Commission up to this point , has it ? Just as USMC Carlos Hathcock said , we set up the scenario in Virginia and nobody could make the shots that LHO was to have made , and that includes Hathcock himself , who was one of the best snipers ever ! A fusillade of shots came into the Limo with JFK getting hit in the head 3 times , a frontal throat shot and a shallow shot in the back which makes JFK being hit 5 times himself as per Douglas Horne AARB . Who told Gerald Ford that it was OK to move JFK's Back Shot up to the base of the neck therefore starting the Arlen Specter lie of 'The Single Bullet Theory' ! Ford was J Edgar Hoovers mole IMO .

 Ford was J Edgar Hoovers mole IMO .

Yes, you're right, there is ample evidence that Gerald Ford was Hoover's spy on the Warren commission.   

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #312 on: April 11, 2020, 11:01:59 AM »
Who prodded Nellie Connally to resist the fragment removal?
https://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-xpm-1993-06-18-9306180244-story.html

What would be the point in removing those fragments?

Online Gerry Down

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1167
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #313 on: April 11, 2020, 12:59:43 PM »
Yes, you're right, there is ample evidence that Gerald Ford was Hoover's spy on the Warren commission.

Such as?

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #314 on: April 11, 2020, 01:13:09 PM »
Such as?

It's a long story,    Read the WR. and Portrait of an Assassin.