Which Station Waggon's Featured on 11/22/63?

[Lee Wotton]

 The evidence was circumstantial at best and not good enough for a conviction.  Why do people think he was killed? A failed trial would prove conspiracy.

Chief Curry admitted that they had no solid evidence against Lee Oswald......

A failed trial would prove conspiracy.

Hoover and LBJ could not afford to allow Lee Oswald to live long enough to go to trial .......  They were soiling their skivvies when they learned that Lee hadn't been killed in the TSBD.....

Totally agree Walt, the FBI tried to get Curry to retract his statement that Oswald was known to the FBI

[Paul McBrearty]

I agree, a trial of LHO would have found him not guilty.  The evidence was circumstantial at best and not good enough for a conviction.  Why do people think he was killed? A failed trial would prove conspiracy.

A trial of Lee Harvey Oswald would have found him not guilty. How wrong you are. Typical conspiracy hobbyist that has a compulsion to point the finger of blame at everyone other than Oswald.
The evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK is substantial both direct and indirect when put together as a whole and overwhelming. The evidence that Oswald shot JD Tippit is ironclad. Any competent jury would have found him guilty with more than enough evidence for a conviction. He was shot by Jack Ruby because like Oswald, Ruby was a lone nut looking for a place in the limelight.

[Walt Cakebread]

Totally agree Walt, the FBI tried to get Curry to retract his statement that Oswald was known to the FBI

the FBI tried to get Curry to retract his statement that Oswald was known to the FBI

John Edgar Hoover who was the the FBI ( read God Father) in 1963,  tried to get Curry to retract his statement that he knew that Oswald was CAPABLE  OF ASSASSINATING JFK.

FBI agent James Hosty had been ordered by Hoover ( through SAIC  Gordon Shanklin) to go to DPD headquarters and control the interrogation of Lee Harvey Oswald.  ( This occurred BEFORE  The DPD knew the name of the suspect they had arrested in the Texas theater.)-----  How did Hoover know that Lee Harvey Oswald had not been shot in the theater and had been arrested by the Dallas police BEFORE the police had confirmed his identity??   Answer....Three of Hoover's mafia dons were in the theater at the time the Dallas police arrested that dastardly culprit who snuck into the theater without buying a ticket.

A few minutes after Lee was brought into police headquarters FBI agent James Hosty arrived at police headquarters as Hoover had ordered.   Hosty saw a DPD detective, Jack Revill,  who he knew was the head of the DPD intelligence unit and involved in monitoring subversives in Dallas. 

Hosty blurted out....Jack, a communist has killed JFK,   His name is Lee Harvey Oswald and we knew he was here in Dallas.  We knew he was capable of assassinating the President ( but we never dreamed that he'd actually do it) 


The part in italics and underlined was not part of Revill's memo..... but it was published in a story by Hugh Aynesworth  in the Dallas Morning News on April 24 1964.

This is what had made the God Father J. Edgar Hoover livid......  There was nothing on record that indicated that Lee Oswald was capable  of any violent act. ( He didn't even strike back when he was physically assaulted by Briniguer in New Orleans )  So where did Hosty get the idea that Lee could be set up as the patsy?.....  ans:...  He knew that Lee had fired a bullet through General Walker's window....and that could be made to look like a bonafide attempt to murder Walker. 

[John Anderson]

How would you know what I have said since prior to January 6, 2018, there was NO John Anderson on this forum?

Wrong. I read the complete archives before the site crashed.

[Walt Cakebread]

We are talking about you and not a smart person.

Rob, LOOK at the photos of Detective Day checking the CARCANO rifle for fingerprints behind a TSBD window that is brightly lit by sunshine.   
Day clearly is examining the carcano and the shadows indicate that the time is about 1:45 pm ......

Learn to face the truth.....Roger Craig lied about the carcano being a Mauser.    And it was merely his ego that caused him to lie.   He had made a mistake in believing Seymour Weitzman who mistakenly identified the carcano as a Mauser.  Weitzman admitted that he was in error...but the egotistical  Craig could not admit an error..... so rather than admit his error he embellished the tale in an attempt to make it believable.

Most folks can see Roger Craig as he was....but there are a few who suffer from the same affliction that caused Roger Craig to lie... and those folks will not accept facts that refute some theory they embrace. 

[Walt Cakebread]

I have never relied on Roger Craig for the Mauser issue. Never. You LNers want to make it about him because you think that it is easier to shoot him down, but there is a good bit of evidence without him. You have been shown this evidence repeatedly, but you keep ignoring it and lying about it.

I have never relied on Roger Craig for the Mauser issue. Never.

On what do you base your belief that the rifle found by Boone was a mauser?

You LNers want to make it about him

Rob you are simply discrediting yourself and damaging your image by posting nonsense.....

[Lee Wotton]

A trial of Lee Harvey Oswald would have found him not guilty. How wrong you are. Typical conspiracy hobbyist that has a compulsion to point the finger of blame at everyone other than Oswald.
The evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK is substantial both direct and indirect when put together as a whole and overwhelming. The evidence that Oswald shot JD Tippit is ironclad. Any competent jury would have found him guilty with more than enough evidence for a conviction. He was shot by Jack Ruby because like Oswald, Ruby was a lone nut looking for a place in the limelight.

hahahahahahahaha is it April 1st?