JD Tippit - Serious timing issues

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues  (Read 77782 times)

Offline Eddie Haymaker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Re: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues
« Reply #63 on: December 29, 2018, 02:01:29 AM »
Let me help you guys

You see you need 10-15 minutes for LHO to have done this crime

Now you can't go back 10 - that makes it too soon for LHO to get there

you must go 10-15 minutes forward (move the timeline)

The DPD tried doing that with the JB and JP affidavits sighting LHO at 1.30pm

At the TT. (which strangely nobody has mentioned on this thread)

you LN'ers are trying to move the timeline back - that will not work

So,when I see JB and Mr Bugliosi openly say @1.15pm at Hardy's

That interests me.

and started this thread

your welcome

-------------------------------------

DB getting on the police radio timestamps the murder at @1.16 pm (WR)
every cop in the force heard it and knows the approx time of the murder
The DPD are now "locked in" to that time- nobody thought of that
now the police must work around that timestamp - things start going wrong
fot the DPD version of events as to timing.

That's what happened.

what say you?

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues
« Reply #64 on: December 29, 2018, 04:22:20 AM »
I would like the texas theatre phone records to see
exactly when Mrs Postal called the DPD
Well Eddie, just like a Tx. Theater bag of popcorn and Snickers bar from that same day...phone records are long gone. But that white jacket is still stashed away and I want to see it along with a lab guy. So who's with me?
 

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues
« Reply #65 on: December 29, 2018, 04:52:08 AM »
Maybe DB just had

I-N-T-E-G-R-I-T-Y

(the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles)

unlike most of the other JD witnesses who crumbled quickly under DPD pressure

Did DB know Oswald? god don't be so ridiculous

construct a decent argument

Don't just throw crap around and see what sticks

Did DB know Oswald?
>>> AT THE TIME HE WAS OBSERVING THE CRIME

The answer is in his statement calling (who turned out to be) Oswald 'the other guy'

Offline Eddie Haymaker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Re: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues
« Reply #66 on: December 29, 2018, 05:17:10 AM »
Did DB know Oswald?
>>> AT THE TIME HE WAS OBSERVING THE CRIME

The answer is in his statement calling (who turned out to be) Oswald 'the other guy'

omg you doubling down?

is that the very best you can do?

super weak sauce

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues
« Reply #67 on: December 29, 2018, 05:23:51 AM »
Do you revel in making a fool of yourself, Chappie?

Tell us just how more fair he could he have been to Oswald, given that he himself said he couldn't have been sure in identifying Oswald in a lineup that day...

The FACT is, we don't know exactly what Benavides told the DPD on the afternoon of the murder....BUT we do know that the all of the other witnesses who saw a man leaving the scene were considered "witnesses" and they had no choice about viewing a line up....  But you believe that Dom Benavides who has told us that he faced the killer face to face and saw him clearly, was give a choice about viewing a line up, and was excused because "he couldn't be sure"  ....  What are you using for a brain?...

Perhaps you can recall Helen Markham....  She certainly didn't want to go to the line up and she clearly said that she didn't recognize anybody in the line up....

It's obvious to me that the police did not want Benavides to view a line up, and I believe the reason they did not want him on record is because he had seen Lee Oswald on TV and like Howard Brennan, KNEW that Lee Oswald was not the killer.

For lineup starters:

Markham: #2
Callaway: #2

(Dirty Harvey being mystery guest #2)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues
« Reply #68 on: December 29, 2018, 05:37:24 AM »
omg you doubling down?

is that the very best you can do?

super weak sauce

I think you lot are on the sauce

Do you not understand my point? Maybe scroll back to my initial reply to Waldo regarding what I'll call his back-to-the-future nonsense re DomB's 1965 (?) interview referring to Oswald generically.
« Last Edit: December 29, 2018, 05:44:26 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: JD Tippit - Serious timing issues
« Reply #69 on: December 29, 2018, 05:50:12 AM »
Do you not understand my point? Maybe scroll back to my initial reply to Waldo regarding what I'll call his back-to-the-future nonsense.


Apparently you think Benavides could have IDed Lee Oswald ..... But you're an idiot and a fool Chappie.


You asked a really stupid question....Did Dom B know the name of the 'other guy' AT THE TIME HE WAS OBSERVING THE CRIME, OR NOT?

Commonsense would dictate that Dom did NOT know the name of the killer....He "MAY" have recognized him from some prior encounter, but I doubt that he knew the man's name.   His life wouldn't have been worth a copper cent if he knew the killer.

In the Video , which was filmed a couple of years after the murder....Everybody in the world knew the name of Lee Harvey Oswald....but how did Benavides Identify the man?.... Did he say Oswald shot him??   

No !!   He did NOT!.... Benavides identified the killer as quote:  "This other man" ...

You're dumber than a garden slug ...Chappie.