Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?  (Read 47832 times)

Online Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #70 on: December 23, 2018, 03:26:57 AM »
Yes, the shirt/jacket bunching proves squat. And the SBF is actually the SBH (Hypothesis) because it is merely a guess and there is NO evidence to support it. Especially the bunching of JFK's clothing.  ::)

Mytton is such a cut and paster who knows squat about ballistics, image analysis and science in general. There is only 1 thing you need to ask yourself and that is at what vertebrae did the MB strike JFK's back and what vertebrae did it exit his throat? How his jacket bunched is totally irrelevant and proves that you don't know what proof means. A scientist you ain't. So what is your answer Mytton? Here's a hint dufus:





So what vertebrae did the MB smash thru? T1/T2?

What vertebrae did they perform the tracheotomy? C6/C7?

Now draw a straight line from the back wound to the throat to see if it lines up with the 6th floor of the TSBD. What was JFK's body orientation to make it work? Was that his actual body orientation? Do they mesh? This is just simple geometry, no ballistics expert required. So what angle did you get? What angle should you have got? Here's a hint dufus:

Get in between 2 lasers pointed at each other as shown below. Line up the lower laser at your throat at approx. C6/C7. Does the high laser strike your back as per the autopsy photo at T1/T2? Or is it where Gerald Ford moved it to?



We will wait for you to post your "proof" that the SBH was even possible, let alone feasible. Otherwise, you need to give up on all this jacket bunching nonsense and use some common sense for a change.

JTrojan

Offline Jim Brunsman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #71 on: December 23, 2018, 03:43:36 AM »
Never mind the fact that several autopsy witnesses reported Humes' struggles to understand why the BULLET DID NOT TRANSIT THE BODY. These witnesses and the Sibert and O'Neill report state that the end of the wound could be felt while probing this wound. How could this missile be any threat to Connally? Answer is simple and it TOTALLY DESTROYS the imbecilic SBT.


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5031
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #72 on: December 23, 2018, 06:28:47 AM »
Never mind the fact that several autopsy witnesses reported Humes' struggles to understand why the BULLET DID NOT TRANSIT THE BODY. These witnesses and the Sibert and O'Neill report state that the end of the wound could be felt while probing this wound. How could this missile be any threat to Connally? Answer is simple and it TOTALLY DESTROYS the imbecilic SBT.

     Thumb1:

Offline Eddie Haymaker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #73 on: December 23, 2018, 09:45:10 AM »


Doesn't this destroy the MBT alone?

It's clearly not a ricochet but a direct hit

The windshield damage could be a ricochet from the final shot

This clearly is not

Jack your wound looks WAY too high.

It looks as If Mr Ford has done some of his handy work on it. lol

Official autopsy say's 3rd thoracic vertebrae (5-6 inches down from the collar)
The evidence fits perfectly



this is where the bullet stopped and why the wound was so shallow

To think people really believe this bullet could find its way to the front of the trachea without smashing the spinal column amazes me.If it did do that all the bone and bullet would have blasted out the front of the trachea and JFK would have died instantly with a golfball sized exit wound in his throat.
Dont forget this bullet is still traversing at high velocity (enough to kill another man) on exiting JFK's neck.

After all that the bullet really GETS CRAZY. It is simply nonsensical.

There's some of our evidence. Where is your's?

« Last Edit: December 23, 2018, 10:42:30 AM by Eddie Haymaker »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5031
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #74 on: December 23, 2018, 04:22:21 PM »


Doesn't this destroy the MBT alone?

It's clearly not a ricochet but a direct hit

The windshield damage could be a ricochet from the final shot

This clearly is not

Jack your wound looks WAY too high.

It looks as If Mr Ford has done some of his handy work on it. lol

Official autopsy say's 3rd thoracic vertebrae (5-6 inches down from the collar)
The evidence fits perfectly



this is where the bullet stopped and why the wound was so shallow

To think people really believe this bullet could find its way to the front of the trachea without smashing the spinal column amazes me.If it did do that all the bone and bullet would have blasted out the front of the trachea and JFK would have died instantly with a golfball sized exit wound in his throat.
Dont forget this bullet is still traversing at high velocity (enough to kill another man) on exiting JFK's neck.

After all that the bullet really GETS CRAZY. It is simply nonsensical.

There's some of our evidence. Where is your's?

    Very concise & on point presentation. They have absolutely nowhere to go. Hence the crickets.

Offline Eddie Haymaker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #75 on: December 23, 2018, 07:54:18 PM »
I don't have to sell it either, this sh^t sells itself

Thankyou Sir - For your kind words

Offline Eddie Haymaker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #76 on: December 23, 2018, 09:31:45 PM »
Is that it Mr Organ?

Thats your comeback?

That x-ray is NOT consistent with JFK's wounds

It is no where even close.



At least an inch higher than the clavicle (feel that on your neck)

Which means the rear bullet had to strike higher than that from behind

It has to hit JFK squarely in the lower neck - which is NOT EVEN CLOSE

To the actual wounds.Clearly shot in the upper back and not the neck (official

autopsy photos) The MB would be an OBVIOUS neck shot from behind.



Even though I feel this picture is not correct or has been altered

I cannot resist using it as it is supplied by the government

AND IT STILL HARMS THE WC CASE,Its obviously too low to support the MBT.

you see the unusual wound shape? Tweezers have removed the bullet

and left their telltale marks on the wound.

----------------------------------------------------------------

come on Bugliosi's Boyz - bring it, I'm at yo mamma's house for Christmas.

« Last Edit: December 24, 2018, 12:40:16 AM by Eddie Haymaker »