There is only one remaining question

[Walt Cakebread]

I don?t disagree with your statement. The anomalies in Oswalds?s behavior before, during and after the event are curious indeed. Law enforcement looks at consciousness of guilt along with physical and medical evidence. No one researcher, regardless of their beliefs can explain with a high degree of certainty LHO?s behavior on 11/22. That?s my point. It will never be explained with 100 % certainty.

C'mon Mr May, don't try to evade....  You have just said that you agree with me, and that Lee Oswald would not have kept that piece of junk scope on the rifle, because it was just a worthless piece of junk that added weight and bulk to a rifle that you believe he was disassembling to stuff into a paper sac to smuggle into the TSBD. 

But we both know that the scope was on the rifle when it was found.  So either Lee was NOT the rifle expert that you try to portray, or he was a complete nut who didn't know enough to check zero on his rifle before setting out on his mission.

[John Iacoletti]

There are lots of remaining questions.  Pretty much everything about this case is a remaining question, despite Paul May's insistence that it has all been settled.

[Paul May]

Evade what? There is no resolution. I cannot evade what doesn?t exist. Oswald was a successful assassin by inches.  No doubt, he was going for a head shot. The easiest shot was shot #3.  We can deduce that in reality he missed two out of three shots. Was it nerves? The 11 MPH wind he didn?t account for? Nobody knows. We?ll never know. Using Occam?s razor principles, Oswald hit the easy shot after missing intended target twice. This issue as most have been debated 55 years with no resolution to a 100% certainty. It cannot be resolved. We can only guess based on what we do know. JFK died and ALL the evidence points to LHO.

[Paul May]

Perhaps, but there are no remaining answers.

[Walt Cakebread]

There are lots of remaining questions.  Pretty much everything about this case is a remaining question, despite Paul May's insistence that it has all been settled.

Yes, I agree that there a hundreds of unanswered questions.... But I'm trying to resolve just one of those questions concerning what Mr May calls "credible evidence"  ....   

He presented the argument that Lee Oswald was a world class expert who could fire any rifle with extreme accuracy even if the scope was mounted askew.....

I strongly disagree...  No person regardless of his expertise could fire any rifle accurately with the scope mounted out of align with the barrel.  And a true expert ( and would be assassin) would simply have removed that easily removable piece of junk and got it out of his way.....

[Paul May]

So, now, although our conversation was civil, you choose to embellish my words and lie about what I stated.  So, please copy and paste my supposed comment ?LHO was a world class expert who could fire any rifle?. And you wonder why people refuse to engage conspiracy advocates. This is exactly what you people do. You fabricate and lie.  Shameful.

[Walt Cakebread]

So, now, although our conversation was civil, you choose to embellish my words and lie about what I stated.  So, please copy and paste my supposed comment ?LHO was a world class expert who could fire any rifle?. And you wonder why people refuse to engage conspiracy advocates. This is exactly what you people do. You fabricate and lie.  Shameful.

Mr May, I'm merely drawing a conclusion that is based on your theory that Lee Oswald was an expert sniper.

In saying that ?LHO was a world class expert who could fire any rifle?. I am merely translating your theory....because you apparently believe that simply because Lee was able to qualify ( by the skin of his teeth) with an excellent rifle after days of training, that he was then an expert who could fire any old piece of junk rifle with deadly accuracy.