Proof JFK was killed as a result of a conspiracy.

[Keyvan Shahrdar]

Keyvan, Keyvan, Keyvan. You speak falsehoods. I am not a conspiracy theorist at all.

Does the Nix film really show more proof of conspiracy than the Patterson film of Bigfoot? Does not Moorman photograph show more proof of conspiracy than various still pictures of Bigfoot? My point is, the evidence of a JFK assassination conspiracy does not even rise to the level of the very dubious evidence of Bigfoot.

Not true Joe.  The Nix film shows shots fired from the pergola.  The Moorman photo shows a person standing behind Mr. Zapruder.  Mr. Zapruder and Mr. Newman said that they thought the shots came from right behind them.  There is film right after the assassination with what seems to be guns smoke floating around.  Police Officers and Secret Services men have testimony in the Warren Commission stating that they thought the shot came from the shelter.

Facts are facts.  You talking about Bigfoot is nothing more but your attempt at discrediting fact.

You have a problem with facts.  Why?

[Bill Chapman]

You are pushing conspiracy theories with your opinions of what you think is going on in the picture.  How about show proof.  Facts, you have heard of it.

The proof is revealed by eye. No conspiracy required: Just knowledge of perspective. Or just the realization that as a figure moves further back in the picture plane, it diminishes in size.

JohnM's combo now/then pergola image shows the man in the now-pergola on the far right (in black shirt/blue pants/black shoes/proper skin tone) in proper perspective in relation to Sitzman/Zapruder. Additionally, the demonstrated floor level of the pergola clearly reveals the need of either a talent for levitation or access to ladders on the part of your giant-headed shooters.

[Keyvan Shahrdar]

If there's a conspiracy regarding the population of the pergola, blame Mother Nature

The proof is revealed by eye. No conspiracy required: Just knowledge of perspective. Or just the realization that as a figure moves further back in the picture plane, it diminishes it size.

JohnM's combo now/then pergola image shows the man in the now-pergola on the far right (in black shirt/blue pants/black shoes) in proper perspective in relation to Sitzman/Zapruder. Additionally, the demonstrated floor level of the pergola clearly reveals the need of either a talent for levitation or access to ladders on the part of your giant-headed shooters.

You are pushing more conspiracy theories.  Show proof.  You objectifying what you see with your eye is not proof.  Fact is fact.  If you have a problem with these facts, show actual proof that is fact, Chappie!  Blame mother nature, really!

[Steve Logan]

You are asking me to answer your opinions.  It is very simple, the Mary Moorman photo shows that there is a person begins Mr. Zapruder.  Mr. Zapruder and Mr. Newman stated that they believed the shots came behind them.  The Nix Film shows shots fired from that location.  There is testimony from Police Officers and Secret Service men in the Warren Commission about shots coming from that area.  There is film evidence of smoke floating in the area.

The above is proven by photo, film, interview, and testimony from 1st hand sources. 

Accept the truth, it is as simple as that.

Oh I've accepted the truth.
Here's the facts:
1. You can't answer my questions.
2. You've been exposed as a Trash Peddler
3. You don't know the actual meaning of what research is.

If you want any more truth , give me a holler.

[Bill Chapman]

You are pushing more conspiracy theories.  Show proof.  You objectifying what you see with your eye is not proof.  Fact is fact.  If you have a problem with these facts, show actual proof that is fact, Chappie!  Blame mother nature, really!

'Mother Nature' re the laws thereof
'God' if you prefer

How are the laws of nature a conspiracy theory

You have addressed neither the technical demonstration from JohnM regarding the floor level, nor the giant head sizes of your heavily-tanned shooters

[Rob Caprio]

I can't remember where I read it years ago, but it said that there was a manhole inside the concrete structure.

Can anyone who has been there confirm or deny this? Thanks.

[Keyvan Shahrdar]

Oh I've accepted the truth.
Here's the facts:
1. You can't answer my questions.
2. You've been exposed as a Trash Peddler
3. You don't know the actual meaning of what research is.

If you want any more truth , give me a holler.

Keep up the distractions from the undeniable facts.  You are a peddler of opinions that make no sense.