"Out with Bill Shelley in front"

[Nicholas Turner]

So Sir, is it your contention that the reference I made, regarding timing of comments and accompanying hand gestures during the referenced filmed interview, should be considered to be a misstatement?

I wouldn't put it quite like that 

I think what I said is clear.

[Larry Trotter]

Do we know when BWF first mentioned seeing Oswald on the street after he assassination? He certainly mentioned it in an interview with Gary Mack and Mack was clearly astonished but (I'm guessing) put it down to a senior's moment letting it pass with minimal questioning. Everyone seems to treat BWF with kid gloves as he does appear to be a gentle soul who couldn't hold up under a serious line of questioning. Fair enough IMO. That poor guy deserves peace wherever he can find it.

Is there an available link to the mentioned interview of BuellWesleyFrazier done by LawrenceAllen"GaryMack"Dunkel(1946-2015)?

https://www.c-span.org/video/?287933-1/kennedy-assassination-buell-wesley-frazier-part-1

To me, the interviewer, "GaryMack", during the 6/21/'02 filmed two part interview, allows a sufficient follow-up by BuellWesley Frazier to his stated LeeHarveyOswald sighting shortly after the DealeyPlazaShooting on 11/22/'63.

[Larry Trotter]

So Sir, is it your contention that the reference I made, regarding timing of comments and accompanying hand gestures during the referenced filmed interview, should be considered to be a misstatement?

I wouldn't put it quite like that 

I think what I said is clear.

[Nicholas Turner]

Which means?

[Bill Chapman]

It was too dangerous for Mack to delve into yet not so dangerous for him to leave that part of the interview intact so that others can see the clue and follow up with their own inquiries? Do you have any idea how ridiculous that sounds?

Anything goes in CT CrankVille... so no, he doesn't.

[Bill Chapman]

So why didn't Mack edit out the claim that Oswald was seen by Frazier after the event?

Why doesn't Frazier 'come clean' and spill the beans? Is he still concerned about his safety or is it because he has nothing new to offer except scrambled thoughts and memories of a event that happened 50+ years ago?

I get the impression from interviews over recent years that Frazier could, without much effort, be lead into 'confessing' contradictions to his original statements and inventing new information out of nothing.

Like I said I feel pity for the guy.

I agree that he seemed somewhat mixed up. I don't really put much faith in Buell's account: For instance, Mack asked him if he saw Oswald after the shooting, he responds no, then later describes seeing Oswald coming out the back.

Ah, the vagaries of memory...

[Mark A. Oblazney]

Craig died in May 1975 by his own hand. That's almost 12 years after the assassination yet he had to be murdered? What wacky BS aren't you prepared to swallow?

I think there is something wrong in Albert's head.  That's why he keeps writing paragraph after paragraph after paragraph, mostly cluttered with ad hominem and baseless assumptions.  I have submitted a sampling of his writings to a qualified psychologist, and am waiting for her conclusions.  But I seem to see a similarity with his writings and that of the esteemed journalist Ralph Cinque and, the best of them all........ Barbara Hartwell (as in Barbara Hartwell vs. CIA)